Hello guys
I'm from France and already be the owner of a Saab 900 classic convertible (4 seats) from 1990
Am now looking for an E type in 2020 probably a first series 4.2 with 2+2 seats because I've two young children
Glad to be there to find some good informations about French specialized e type resellers and to know more about this wonderful car
New member
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: Near Andover, Hampshire,in D.O. Blighty
#2 Re: New member
Welcome to the forum, you will get lots of help and advice here. You may find getting a 2+2 from the USA the answer as so many E Types went there. The big problem with E Types is rust in the body, which is expensive to fix. Try to look at lots of cars, not just 2+2, you'll learn what to look for. And get someone with good knowledge to look at any car you are thinking of buying.
Good luck
Geoff
Good luck
Geoff
S2 FHC Light Blue
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |
#3 Re: New member
Thanks for this !
I see you have a S2, are they all down sizing from 265 to 170 hp with the 4.2 or only the american one ?
Best
I see you have a S2, are they all down sizing from 265 to 170 hp with the 4.2 or only the american one ?
Best
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |
#4 Re: New member
Hi and welcome!
There was no difference in BHP between the 3.8 and the 4.2. The 4.2 produced more torque.
The figure of 265 is a bit over ambitious. That would be the power produced on the bench by cars prepared a little more "exactly" by jaguar for the initial speed test runs. Production cars weren't so carefully worked on. Also, the power produced by production cars has to allow for ancillaries fitted to the car. The correct figure I have seen quoted for a production E type varies from 170plus to 220ish.
Later USA cars produced less power; they had the 2 stromberg carbs rather than 3 SUs, lower compression engines etc.
Later cars again had emission controls. Some were automatics which take more power in transmission losses.
British spec 3.8's revved more freely than the 4.2s but had less low down torque.
There was no difference in BHP between the 3.8 and the 4.2. The 4.2 produced more torque.
The figure of 265 is a bit over ambitious. That would be the power produced on the bench by cars prepared a little more "exactly" by jaguar for the initial speed test runs. Production cars weren't so carefully worked on. Also, the power produced by production cars has to allow for ancillaries fitted to the car. The correct figure I have seen quoted for a production E type varies from 170plus to 220ish.
Later USA cars produced less power; they had the 2 stromberg carbs rather than 3 SUs, lower compression engines etc.
Later cars again had emission controls. Some were automatics which take more power in transmission losses.
British spec 3.8's revved more freely than the 4.2s but had less low down torque.
Malcolm
I only fit in a 2+2, so got one!
1969 Series 2 2+2
2009 Jaguar XF-S
2015 F Type V6 S
I only fit in a 2+2, so got one!
1969 Series 2 2+2
2009 Jaguar XF-S
2015 F Type V6 S
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |
#5 Re: New member
Salut Miralf,
welcome to the forum!
Happy to see another Frenh here.
Beaucoup d'info et de conseil à trouver pour ta future E!
Tu es de quelle région ?
Je suis en Bretagne.
Cordialement
Michel
welcome to the forum!
Happy to see another Frenh here.
Beaucoup d'info et de conseil à trouver pour ta future E!
Tu es de quelle région ?
Je suis en Bretagne.
Cordialement
Michel
Le chemin sera long!...
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |