DB6 v E type
#1 DB6 v E type
There’s an interesting article in the latest issue of Aston Martin Driver where the reporter drives both cars and compares the relative merits of the DB6 and the 4.2 series1 fhc, and comes to a conclusion on which he’d rather have. Available on Readly for those with a subscription
Darryl
1964 S1 FHC 3.8 opalescent maroon
1964 S1 FHC 3.8 opalescent maroon
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |
#2 Re: DB6 v E type
I’m privileged to be able to drive both and they both have their merits. For a long European drive - as my mate with the DB6 and I have done many times - swapping cars at points, I would drive the Aston. We have been on several long European trips over thousands of miles - some documented in this Forum - and we always keep each other on our insurance policies. Also loads more space for luggage in the DB6. For spirited driving and feeling at one with the car - definitely the E type.
It would be very unfair to describe the Aston as “agricultural”, but although it is a beautiful car, it is a heavy car - although it has power steering - and lacks the responsiveness of the E type. The Aston suspension shows it’s age with a live rear axle, whereas the E Type’s sophisticated independent rear axle makes a better handling car on a twisty road. Although we shouldn’t mention it, the Aston has markedly increased in value compared to the E type, but if I was in the same situation today going to buy either car, the E type definitely has the edge on what you get for your money.
The photos below are from just over 10 years ago when my mate finished restoring his DB6 and brought it down to be my Best Man and drive us both to the wedding venue. The first time I drove it was when after the ceremony he unexpectedly handed me the key so my wife and I could drive it home. I think I was more nervous getting into it to drive it for the first time after his amazing restoration than I had been the whole day !
Horses for courses and both great cars, but each has their own special qualities.
Just my thoughts.
Regards,
Dave
It would be very unfair to describe the Aston as “agricultural”, but although it is a beautiful car, it is a heavy car - although it has power steering - and lacks the responsiveness of the E type. The Aston suspension shows it’s age with a live rear axle, whereas the E Type’s sophisticated independent rear axle makes a better handling car on a twisty road. Although we shouldn’t mention it, the Aston has markedly increased in value compared to the E type, but if I was in the same situation today going to buy either car, the E type definitely has the edge on what you get for your money.
The photos below are from just over 10 years ago when my mate finished restoring his DB6 and brought it down to be my Best Man and drive us both to the wedding venue. The first time I drove it was when after the ceremony he unexpectedly handed me the key so my wife and I could drive it home. I think I was more nervous getting into it to drive it for the first time after his amazing restoration than I had been the whole day !
Horses for courses and both great cars, but each has their own special qualities.
Just my thoughts.
Regards,
Dave
Dave Rose
1967 Series 1 4.2 FHC
1967 Series 1 4.2 FHC
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |
#3 Re: DB6 v E type
A fabulous stable there Dave
Darryl
1964 S1 FHC 3.8 opalescent maroon
1964 S1 FHC 3.8 opalescent maroon
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: Near Andover, Hampshire,in D.O. Blighty
#4 Re: DB6 v E type
Dave
How nice to hear a balanced viewpoint highlighting the benefits and preferences for each car depending on what it is being used for.
Geoff
How nice to hear a balanced viewpoint highlighting the benefits and preferences for each car depending on what it is being used for.
Geoff
S2 FHC Light Blue
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |
#5 Re: DB6 v E type
Maybe a 2+2 might solve some of the „problems“… :-)
Carsten
Carsten
Jag E '66 S1 2+2, 74’Citroen DS 23 Pallas iE, 73’ Citroen SM 3.0, 54’ Citroen 11 BL, 71‘ Velosolex, 88‘ Unimog U1650
Link: | |
BBcode: | |
HTML: | |
Hide post links |