Terribly British

Talk about E-Types here
User avatar

Topic author
lowact
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:05 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:
Australia

#1 Terribly British

Post by lowact » Sun Dec 05, 2021 1:31 pm

Spotted at the Terribly British Day in Queanbeyan was John Wilson’s latest, a supersized S1 etype, wider and taller, full height doors, V12 and xj13 themed rivets and other details.

Image

Image

Image

Johns earlier build was an XJ13 replica, complete with quad cam V12, according to his wife a very nice car if you didn’t mind engine noise and didn’t need to carry more than a credit card ...
Regards,
ColinL
'72 OTS manual V12

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


mystery type
Posts: 935
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:46 am
Location: lancashire
Great Britain

#2 Re: Terribly British

Post by mystery type » Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:22 pm

Yes I agree Colin.
Paul 1967 S1 2+2

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

bitsobrits
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:09 am
Location: Omaha, NE area
United States of America

#3 Re: Terribly British

Post by bitsobrits » Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:57 pm

Yes, most terrible indeed. Looks like this started out as a modern car modified with the intent to be an homage to many and various Jaguar cars of the past. Certainly it's not an S1 E type?
Steve
'65 S1 4.2 FHC (early)

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Series1 Stu
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:26 pm
Location: Shropshire
Great Britain

#4 Re: Terribly British

Post by Series1 Stu » Sun Dec 05, 2021 5:44 pm

Another one for the "No accounting for taste" section?

:shrug:
Stuart

If you can't make it work, make it complicated!

'62 FHC - Nearing completion
'69 Daimler 420 Sovereign
'78 Land Rover Series 3 109

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


christopher storey
Posts: 5698
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: cheshire , england
Great Britain

#5 Re: Terribly British

Post by christopher storey » Sun Dec 05, 2021 6:41 pm

It has the same bloated look as the Challenger replicas, only more so.... indeed I wondered whether it started life as a Challenger

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Gerry
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 6:50 pm
Canada

#6 Re: Terribly British

Post by Gerry » Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:21 pm

Hi Chris ,I think you must be mistaken ,the moulds for the challenger were taken from an early E type roadster ,saw one at a car show in Toronto, very convincing until you got up close ,transmission tunnel was the big give away.
Regards Gerry 62 Ots Ontario Canada.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Series1 Stu
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:26 pm
Location: Shropshire
Great Britain

#7 Re: Terribly British

Post by Series1 Stu » Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:30 pm

I think you could be to right, Christopher. That central tunnels is a simple folded item similar to the Challenger.

Also, does the wheelbase look right? Seems to be at least as long as a series 3.

Regards
Stuart

If you can't make it work, make it complicated!

'62 FHC - Nearing completion
'69 Daimler 420 Sovereign
'78 Land Rover Series 3 109

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

chrisfell
Posts: 1523
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:52 am
Location: Salisbury
St Lucia

#8 Re: Terribly British

Post by chrisfell » Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:17 pm

“Another one for the "No accounting for taste" section?”

I am inclined to agree. I can’t see any of the differences between this and a good OTS being described honestly as “improvements”.
Chris '67 S1 2+2

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1567
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#9 Re: Terribly British

Post by MarekH » Sun Dec 05, 2021 11:47 pm

There are a couple of nice touches hidden in there.

The nine small gauges in the centre console are a clever way to lay out more information. My take on that was to embed LEDs and a second needle/gauge inside each of the small gauges and keeping the layout the same instead.

The very nicely curved speedster style side screens must be perspex/lexan, but being curved, it also means they won't retract. Shame. (I don't see how a soft top attaches - it better not rain.....)

Placing the rear view mirror low is a massive win-win. Rather than having a massive blindspot at every T-junction you pull up to, you now block out bonnet reflections and glare from a low sun instead.

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

AussieEtype
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:59 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Australia

#10 Re: Terribly British

Post by AussieEtype » Mon Dec 06, 2021 6:31 am

christopher storey wrote:
Sun Dec 05, 2021 6:41 pm
It has the same bloated look as the Challenger replicas, only more so.... indeed I wondered whether it started life as a Challenger
You will not find one piece of fibreglass in John's creation. It will be all hand beaten panels. John's original creation of the XJ13 would have to closest to an original as ever has been made - a true piece of art.
1971 Series 3 E-type OTS
1976 Series 2 XJ 12 Coupe

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


tinworm
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:48 am
Location: devon
Great Britain

#11 Re: Terribly British

Post by tinworm » Mon Dec 06, 2021 3:22 pm

I think the 'Wildcat' was the worst 'replica'

Barrie
1968 E-type roadster, 1964 E-type fixed head 1995 Ferrari 355 1980 Ferrari 308 1987 V8 90 Landrover 1988 Bedford rascal van 1943 Ford GPW

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic