Correct in a 3.8?

Technical advice Q&A
User avatar

Topic author
Herblay
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:30 pm
Location: Spain
Spain

#1 Correct in a 3.8?

Post by Herblay » Wed Jan 22, 2020 1:34 pm

Are these two pieces standard equipment on a 3.8 October 1962? Picture is from Jonathan Wood "Jaguar E type - The Complete History", and referred to the 3.8, but I haven't found them but in the 4.2.

Image
S1 FHC 3.8

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Gfhug
Posts: 3323
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:08 pm
Location: Near Andover, Hampshire,in D.O. Blighty
Great Britain

#2 Re: Correct in a 3.8?

Post by Gfhug » Wed Jan 22, 2020 2:06 pm

Clausager Factory Original E Type book page 21:
Change No. RA 7324 June 1964 Lifting brackets added to cylinder head, some head studs lengthened...

Does that help? A very good book to get if you're trying to be as original as possible (with Haddocks (?) books as well)

Geoff
S2 FHC Light Blue
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Herblay
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:30 pm
Location: Spain
Spain

#3 Re: Correct in a 3.8?

Post by Herblay » Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:14 pm

It helps indeed, thanks a lot. I have the Clausager but I did not see that reference, thank you for your help
S1 FHC 3.8

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 8114
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#4 Re: Correct in a 3.8?

Post by mgcjag » Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:19 pm

You could use the factory fit 3.8 section of the forum...lots of info there.....Steve
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (just sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Philk
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:48 am
Great Britain

#5 Re: Correct in a 3.8?

Post by Philk » Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:49 pm

Gfhug wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 2:06 pm
Clausager Factory Original E Type book page 21:
Change No. RA 7324 June 1964 Lifting brackets added to cylinder head, some head studs lengthened...
…. This, in turn, came from the Jaguar Spares Bulletin No. A.146 (Engine) published in August 1964. Copies of these are in the Knowledgebase section of the Forum. This confirms that it is from Engine Number RA.7324

The Service and Spares Bulletins are an excellent source of information as to when changes occurred on the cars. Most of the books on the market are quoting from these when they refer to when changes were made.
Phil
1964 S1 3.8 OTS

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Tony
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:12 pm
Location: UK
Great Britain

#6 Re: Correct in a 3.8?

Post by Tony » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:11 am

My April 62 e type has them if that helps
Tony (E typed)

1962 E Type Series 1 Roadster (OTS)

Tony

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 8114
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#7 Re: Correct in a 3.8?

Post by mgcjag » Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:44 am

Hi Tony....fitted at the factory....or later....Steve
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (just sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Robbiee
Posts: 692
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 12:07 pm
Location: Derbyshire

#8 Re: Correct in a 3.8?

Post by Robbiee » Thu Jan 23, 2020 10:39 am

It was my understanding that the longer studs and engine lifting brackets were fitted from June ‘64
My March ‘62 OTS has them, yet engine block is original but the head may have been changed ..probably added later
Robbie
Robbie 1962 3.8 Coupe OSG 1962 OTS ODG

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic