Rad air control flaps

Talk about the E-Type Series 3
User avatar

Topic author
Fspp369
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:23 am
Location: Coventry
Great Britain

#21 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by Fspp369 » Sat Dec 12, 2020 10:01 am

I forgot to say that I have since ground off the mounting lugs on the fan bodies that were present for the original fitment because they catch on everything inc my hands.... having shovels for hands that is!
P
Peter {XKE V12HE efi}
XKRS
RR Phantom 3 1937 Sedanca de Ville.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1567
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#22 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by MarekH » Sat Dec 12, 2020 12:45 pm

jagwit wrote:
Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:29 pm
Without those flaps fans will suck air into tbose holes, not through the radiator.

They must be fitted.
That's only going to be true at low road speeds.

If it were universally true, then you could just have a plain sealed box with no need for flaps at all.

The true purpose of the flaps is more likely that at high road speeds, only a limited amount of air can get through past the fan blades and so the excess airflow can get through by simply pushing the flaps open. Cars with aircon will have an evaporator matrix ahead of the radiator and both fans running all of the time, even when the car is going fast. Without flaps, the front of the car is going to act more like a solid wall so limiting the air getting through the aircon matrix and car radiator.

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

jagwit
Posts: 616
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:52 am
Location: George
South Africa

#23 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by jagwit » Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:39 pm

My view is that the purpose of those flaps is to close the cowling when the fans are running (just like a closed box) at low vehicle speeds. If they also open at high speeds with fans running, then sure, more air is being pushed through the radiator than what the fans can suck through. Do we know this for a fact??

But at high speeds - when the fans are NOT running - they are meant to be pushed open with ram air to allow the maximum amount of air flow through the radiator, TO LIMIT the amount of fan use to a minimum, preferrably none.

Bottom line: They must all be fitted.

So who is going to do a video to prove things either way????
Best Regards
Philip
Jag: 72 S3 XKE, 74 S3 XKE OTS, 80 XJS (Megasquirt + 5sp manual O/D)
Jensen: 74 Interceptor (EFI by Megasquirt + O/D 4sp auto)
Chev: 59 Apache std, 70 C10 (350V8, 700R4)

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

PeterCrespin
Posts: 4561
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Contact:
United States of America

#24 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by PeterCrespin » Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:05 am

You should fit a vertical divider to S2 & S3 fan shrouds. The day one fan fails or runs low speed only (if two-speed) the remaining fan will preferentially suck air from the adjacent half across the back of the matrix instead of through it. A vane almost touching the matrix prevents this.

With a downflow S3 rad it’s a nuisance in traffic. If it’s the right fan on an S2 it can be a bit more significant.
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

jagwit
Posts: 616
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:52 am
Location: George
South Africa

#25 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by jagwit » Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:10 am

PeterCrespin wrote:
Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:05 am
You should fit a vertical divider to S2 & S3 fan shrouds.
I recon that is a VERY good suggestion Peter. If one fan somehow displaces less air than the other, surely the lack of a divider would also render the weaker fan's contribution even less efficient? Eg, if the good fan flows "10" units of air and the weaker one flows "8", having them suck on the same space, could that not render the weaker one to flow 6 rather than 8 ?

IIRC, the fan shroud of the XJS has exactly such a divider between the mechanical fan and the smaller electrical fan, surely for this very reason??
Best Regards
Philip
Jag: 72 S3 XKE, 74 S3 XKE OTS, 80 XJS (Megasquirt + 5sp manual O/D)
Jensen: 74 Interceptor (EFI by Megasquirt + O/D 4sp auto)
Chev: 59 Apache std, 70 C10 (350V8, 700R4)

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Fspp369
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:23 am
Location: Coventry
Great Britain

#26 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by Fspp369 » Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:59 am

Mmm?
Surely if one fan fails then that’s sides flaps will tend to remain closed, as their resting position is closed. Any air drawn through the rad by the working fan will be coming from the rad and not through the cowl from the rear, and thus any air going backwards will come via the matrix and hence cool the rad, indeed if the central divide is fitted then one side of the matrix will be cooler than the other, leading perhaps to a horizontal stratification within the rad with possibly detrimental effects.
If you need a definitive answer then talk to a thermodynamics expert working on radiator design. I know several...NOT ! Any other theories are simply that, informed speculation. The idea of watching rad flap action whilst driving and concurrently monitoring thermal patterns is an interesting topic in itself ...made for Marek I think :?: :bigrin: :yellow:
Peter {XKE V12HE efi}
XKRS
RR Phantom 3 1937 Sedanca de Ville.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1567
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#27 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by MarekH » Sun Dec 13, 2020 12:40 pm

A central partition sounds like a very good idea.

This is also the logic behind the fitting of the radiator foam over the shroud:- this forces air through the radiator as there is no easy path around instead.

I shan't investigate further as I have used up my flow sensors to monitor the water flow through the radiator and bypass tubes on the v12 and am not too bothered to make more available. We already know the limiting case for cooling capacity is when rpm and airflow are both at a minimum, exacerbated only if you are too close to the car in front in stop/go traffic or crawling steep uphill.

In any case Philip and I are saying the same thing; one from the point of view of slow speed and the other from the point of view of faster road speeds.

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Series1 Stu
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:26 pm
Location: Shropshire
Great Britain

#28 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by Series1 Stu » Sun Dec 13, 2020 12:44 pm

Fspp369 wrote:
Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:59 am
indeed if the central divide is fitted then one side of the matrix will be cooler than the other, leading perhaps to a horizontal stratification within the rad with possibly detrimental effects.
That would only be true if there was no coolant flow in the radiator. When the thermostats are open and the flow is correct, there would be no real hot or cold spots. Just reduced cooling efficiency.

I think all the answers you need have already been provided by Peter and Marek, although I can arrange for some expert advice from a thermodynamicist if you would like.

Regards
Stuart

If you can't make it work, make it complicated!

'62 FHC - Nearing completion
'69 Daimler 420 Sovereign
'78 Land Rover Series 3 109

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Fspp369
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:23 am
Location: Coventry
Great Britain

#29 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by Fspp369 » Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:37 pm

A good thermodynamics appraisal would be interesting.
Does the rad have any lateral flow, given that the tubes run vertically?
If you treat each tube as a separate entity, then given an even air flow, all tubes would be the same temp but if the air flow is asymmetric then differentials would exist.
I still see no advantage to a central partition, BTW neither did Jaguar apparently.
Peter.
Peter {XKE V12HE efi}
XKRS
RR Phantom 3 1937 Sedanca de Ville.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

PeterCrespin
Posts: 4561
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Contact:
United States of America

#30 Re: Rad air control flaps

Post by PeterCrespin » Wed Dec 16, 2020 3:06 am

There is no advantage if both fans are functioning. Nor would there be an advantage if the fans were the modern multi-blade type with a circumferential ring preventing spill-over and acting as a built-in circular cowl over the blade swept area.

However the Jag twin fans are quite far from the matrix in an angled box, not flat. This lets two marginally larger fans fit in a tighter space, like valves in a hemi or pent-roof chamber. That’s great while everything works, but if one dies the other one is already angled towards the dud one’s hole in the cowling, ready to steal air...

It’s not a binary yes/no scenario but clearly some air would be drawn across the back of the adjacent matrix with such a twin cowl design and a separator would prevent that. It’s a harder sell, of course, to recommend a mod which will likely never be required to kick in...
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic