S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Talk about the E-Type Series 3
User avatar

jagwit
Posts: 616
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:52 am
Location: George
South Africa

#21

Post by jagwit » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:10 pm

Woolfi wrote: If I understand the previous information correct the car with the lowest gas consumption was a stock HE XJS, using less gas than the EV12 with EFI. Is this correct ?
Does your EV12 with EFI have a correct working vacuum advance ?
The stock HE XJS was the lowest yes, he also "cheated" the most. The idea was to drive at "the max speed that could safely and legally (120km/h) be maintained" but I caught up with him and found him cruising along at 100km/h. Do not forget about the effect of gearing though!! That XJS runs about 2600rpm at 120km/h, whereas my E-type runs at 3100rpm @ 120km/h. Also note that the Megasquirted XJS is a pre-HE (This does not seem clear from my posting) which is supposed to be MUCH heavier on fuel consumption than the HE and that car did better than my E-type DESPITE having a PRE-HE engine and being heavier than the E. That XJS (it is also my car) has a 5-speed manual and it does 2000rpm at 120km/h. My daughter drove the car on the day and she does not know much about economic driving. She also had the AC on all the time!

Regarding your question about correct vacuum advance. What is the definition of "correct"? Is it "the same as what the distributor would have given" or is it "the amount of advance that would make the engine most efficient at any given operating point". In my case it is neither since my timing maps are tuned by "gut feel". That does not make my timing maps "optimal". The timing maps can only be optimal when the engine is tuned on a braked dyno to find the MINIMUM advance that would yield max power at any operating point. Still the figures I posted is what I got based on my "thumbsuck" timing maps. Imagine if they were dyno tuned....
Best Regards
Philip
Jag: 72 S3 XKE, 74 S3 XKE OTS, 80 XJS (Megasquirt + 5sp manual O/D)
Jensen: 74 Interceptor (EFI by Megasquirt + O/D 4sp auto)
Chev: 59 Apache std, 70 C10 (350V8, 700R4)

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Topic author
JIM BAUMANN
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: Southampton UK
Contact:

#22

Post by JIM BAUMANN » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:18 pm

Thank you for a most interesting and edifying discussion! The fuel injected route is one I had also considered--and whilst I certainly do have an interest in fuel economy ( everyone who owns a V12 has! :D ) my primary pursuit was a low-down performance gain rather than economy. I am particularly interested in any performance gains from the fuel injected set-up, certainly if you own both a V12 E-type as well as an XJS you should be able to hopefully give me some insight and first hand experience...?

Thank you and Tschuess!

Jim Baumann
MGB GT V8 4.6 1972
Renault Caravelle 1967
Peugeot 504 cabriolet 1973
Jaguar E-type V12 1973
Panhard PL 17 1960

my modelboats:
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1567
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#23

Post by MarekH » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:41 pm

Jim,
take a look at this item currently on ebay:-

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Jaguar-Series ... 2a247af750

(that's all supposed to be one line btw). It shows what the inside of what (I presume) a Weber bonnet looks like. Food for thought,eh?

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

jagwit
Posts: 616
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:52 am
Location: George
South Africa

#24

Post by jagwit » Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:20 am

JIM BAUMANN wrote: certainly if you own both a V12 E-type as well as an XJS you should be able to hopefully give me some insight and first hand experience...?
I was getting very worried that we had hi-jacked your thread Jim!! But it seems you are enjoying it, so that is a relief. I have a web site with several links to other sites with my info that you can have a look at here: http://www.jaguardiy.net Any other questions, just ask. I see you have an MGB V8. I have also done several MS installs on the Rover V8. That car is also begging for EFI!! The nice thing is that EFI conversions are relatively easily reverted back to original for those to whom originality is more important than a car that can be enjoyed to its fullest.
Best Regards
Philip
Jag: 72 S3 XKE, 74 S3 XKE OTS, 80 XJS (Megasquirt + 5sp manual O/D)
Jensen: 74 Interceptor (EFI by Megasquirt + O/D 4sp auto)
Chev: 59 Apache std, 70 C10 (350V8, 700R4)

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Topic author
JIM BAUMANN
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: Southampton UK
Contact:

#25

Post by JIM BAUMANN » Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:59 am

I digress for a while herewith.... :D Its an education to see the font of knowledge and experience so readily shared!

(Here goes- changing tack in the thread)

Disclaimer:
My driving style listed below pertains to my past more youthful exuberance...(!) I have slowed and calmed with my 50 Birthday looming close. My MGB V8 is not an original MGB V8. I have always liked MGB's--despite being 6 ft 4 in tall I have always fitted in comfortably and liked the 'smallness' of the car even when pressing on in narrow English country lanes the car is so small and narrow that one stands a sporting chance of avoiding disaster from the opposite direction...( hmnnn!) I have owned the car for over 25 years - 15 of these it has been in V8 form. It did start life as a normal MGB 1.8--but I wanted more oopppmh! 3.5 V8- installed and brakes improved etc etc That engine became errr..."over-stressed..." whilst ... err... keeping up with a 911 on the M3 motorway. Immediately I knew I needed a bigger and better engine (the blue smoke out of the exhaust was a definite clue!). I must state here that my ?mechanic-ing? is at quite some arms length--so I hope what I am stating below is correct.

My engine builder used a Range Rover block 4.0 and bored it out further, installed a longer throw crankshaft from REAL STEEL to give a displacement of around 4.6 litr. Rover Vitesse (SDI) hemi-spherical pistons and fast road cam. Balanced and lightened most components (except flywheel). Heads polished and gas flow smoothed. John Wolfe Racing inlet manifold topped with a 690 cfm 4 barrel Edelbrock carburettor, big bore tubular exhaust manifolds (RV8 style) thru the inner wings with "shotgun" style twin straight thru exhausts with 4 x Jetex sound dampers (no baffles per se) this keeps the noise down well to approx 3500-4000 rpm. Seam welded and strengthened sills, additional bracing and strengthening throughout the car, a taller axle with a taller final drive - but retaining the original gearbox 4 speed with 2 x overdrive on 3 & 4 gear - great fun flicking the overdrive/gears 4 times keeping the engine pulling strongly at its optimum. Quad pot vented discs fwd, 1 inch anti-roll bars front and back, anti tramp-axle locating stabilising bars, telescopic Koni shockers throughout

The car is a 'home-made' hybrid utilising "Dinosaur" technology. Last time on the rolling road it was producing around 250 bhp in a small light car that does translate as pretty good low down grunt. Ergo my yard-stick - the MG versus for the E-type is purely at this stage perceived feeling rather than tangible figures. E-type is currently having all paint removed--so will be about 4 weeks before I can establish any figures to work from
but I am still interested and fascinated by the depth of knowledge and research that has been done here.

more!!

Jim Baumann
Last edited by JIM BAUMANN on Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MGB GT V8 4.6 1972
Renault Caravelle 1967
Peugeot 504 cabriolet 1973
Jaguar E-type V12 1973
Panhard PL 17 1960

my modelboats:
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Topic author
JIM BAUMANN
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: Southampton UK
Contact:

#26

Post by JIM BAUMANN » Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:29 am

@ MarekH....

I followed up the e-bay link.... thank you. The inside of the bonnet does certainly look err.... not as should? Certainly sobering stuff - a step backwards, a deep breath and more patience required before embarking on anything. I need to think before I leap (and spend!)

Thank you for the heads up.
MGB GT V8 4.6 1972
Renault Caravelle 1967
Peugeot 504 cabriolet 1973
Jaguar E-type V12 1973
Panhard PL 17 1960

my modelboats:
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

jagwit
Posts: 616
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:52 am
Location: George
South Africa

#27

Post by jagwit » Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:31 am

JIM BAUMANN wrote:Rover Vitesse( SDI) hemi-spherical pistons
Where does one get these Jim? The only suitable 4.6 pistons I could find are the ones from Real Steel but they come with 9.35:1 compression ratio and I'm looking for something around 10 - 10.5.
Best Regards
Philip
Jag: 72 S3 XKE, 74 S3 XKE OTS, 80 XJS (Megasquirt + 5sp manual O/D)
Jensen: 74 Interceptor (EFI by Megasquirt + O/D 4sp auto)
Chev: 59 Apache std, 70 C10 (350V8, 700R4)

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Topic author
JIM BAUMANN
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: Southampton UK
Contact:

#28

Post by JIM BAUMANN » Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:25 am

Pass - I think they came from a broken SDI Vitesse engine. As said, it was done at arms length for me and it was 12 years ago (and less than 4000 miles since!!! Sorry I can not be more helpful but I am merely the end-user.

Brmmm!!!

Regards
JB
MGB GT V8 4.6 1972
Renault Caravelle 1967
Peugeot 504 cabriolet 1973
Jaguar E-type V12 1973
Panhard PL 17 1960

my modelboats:
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Topic author
JIM BAUMANN
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: Southampton UK
Contact:

#29

Post by JIM BAUMANN » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:07 pm

Hello all agin!

having last month received the car back from the paint-shop--I drove both it and the MG quite intensely for a week and a half

( before sending the Jag back to the paint-shop ( for final fettling and more improving..!)


IO have not had either car on a rolling road yet-- so have no concrete and tangible facts or figures to speak of per se--

My conclusion reached so far is:

I believe the MG is quicker to 30 mph off a standing start-- big torque, lighter car and lower gearing would suggest this

== > once past 30 mid range acceleration to 60 they are probably about level

at 60-70 mph upwards the longer legs of the E-type become very evident...

The entire feel of the cars is so very different, the MG being quite rough and rather vocal suggests being in a propeller-driven fighter..... all very tactile and mechanical

as opposed to the more subtle jet-like quality of the Jaguar--smoother and rather (!)quieter...

At this stage I will simply enjoy both cars for their differing qualities...

I plan on visiting a rolling road set-up in early May with both cars--will report back with some figures--I for one am much intrigued as to what the respective graphs will look like!

I am quite looking fprward to simply having the car back from the painters...!

Thank you all for your discussion and insights!

JIM B
MGB GT V8 4.6 1972
Renault Caravelle 1967
Peugeot 504 cabriolet 1973
Jaguar E-type V12 1973
Panhard PL 17 1960

my modelboats:
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

PeterCrespin
Posts: 4561
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Contact:
United States of America

#30

Post by PeterCrespin » Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:52 pm

Remember the lower gearing will flatter the MG torque but your 'seat of the pants' dyno readings sound quite believable. Caterham vs Aston gives a similar feel.
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Woolfi
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:57 pm
Location: Germany
Germany

#31 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by Woolfi » Fri Mar 16, 2018 9:45 am

Hello Jim,
have you done the conversion to EFI with you EV12 ?
Result ?
Regards Wolfgang Gatza

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Ole-xke1974
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 9:52 am
Location: Holmfirth, West Yorkshire
Great Britain

#32 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by Ole-xke1974 » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:24 am

Jim,
there's a couple of pieces of information that made me turn away from the Weber conversion:
-The weber set up is able to provide more air/fuel mix than the E-V12 han handle in a standard set up and therefore in my view a bit like shooting a sparrow with a canon.
-To get the best effect from the Webers, I considered cams and pistons as well, which made it a very pricey project, with an uncertain outcome.
-For all the reasons already mentioned about the positioning of the webers and therefore less than optimal configuration.
-Finally, when doing my research a couple of years ago, I found that it was highly recommended that you invest in a fire extinguisher when buying the kit !!!

On the positive side, they clean up the engine bay and look damned good !

I have chosen the best solution for me. I have installed a fidanza flywheel, a 4speed w. O/D and have ordered an SU conversion kit, which I hope will be delivered shortly. As an alround best performing carburetor I find the variable venturi concept superior to fixed venruri versions, which as we know are preferred in race configurations for all the right reasons.

FYI, even with the old slushbox my S3 would spin the tyres when setting of in a spirited fashion :-)
1974 SIII E-Type w. XJ S2 4sp w. O/D

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

JJC
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:06 pm
United States of America

#33 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by JJC » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:44 am

Hi Jim: You did the right thing ! I have had my 73 OTS for 44 years. Considered Webbers a long time ago, for about 3 minutes. Not worth the effort, and not driving around at very high rev's, for long hauls.........which is what the Webbers are designed for. I did, years ago, switch to SU's for several reasons. One is that you can buy NEW SU's, if you desire...can't buy new Strombergs. Easy to install and work on. Performance, same as the Strombergs. What I did do long ago was to switch to K&N filters. Slight (very slight) bump in performance, and easy to keep clean and re-use, as opposed to replacing old paper filters. I might add, that if you are not aware of him, you should get to know Joe Curto, in Queens , NY. He is the best of the best of all things SU, Strombergs, etc. Google Joe, and call him with any questions. Happy Motoring !!

John

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


TheDampMan
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:22 pm
Location: Stoke on Trent
Great Britain

#34 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by TheDampMan » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:48 am

For sale on flebay might be of interest

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Jaguar-V12-5 ... SwgLdapUSm
Steve
1969 Series 2 Roadster
BMW Isetta

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

lowact
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:05 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:
Australia

#35 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by lowact » Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:35 pm

G’day Jim.
Yr 250 hp (DIN?), 1100 kg MG hotrod would therefore have pwr-to-weight ratio = 169 watts/kg. A stock V12E is 203 kW (272 hp) and weighs 1515 kg, i.e. power to weight ratio = 134 watts/kg. So in a drag race yr MGB should win easily.
For yr V12E to win out on paper you would need to increase output to at least 260 kW (350 hp). Those Webers should come close, stock V12E’s are intake limited, 6 monster Webers should fix that.
Making them fit is apparently not so difficult, here is one example of many: http://www.themotoringenthusiast.com/cars/74-e-type
Here is another, side-drafts with long inlet tracts, for better mid-range torque:
http://www.trar.de/en/cars-bikes/jaguar ... e-2-2.html
One feature of Webers that you might find attractive, they have fuel pumps, same as yr Edelbrock, so when you stomp the accelerator the mixture by enriched by boosting the petrol, giving a noticeable “shove-in the-back”. Unlike CD carbs (SU’s or Strombergs) which richen the mixture by throttling the air, so there is no sudden thrust, just a gradual build-up.
I’m sort of at the same place as you. I looked at this (Weber) approach in some detail. Is not 4 me. Each to his own.
Regards,
ColinL
'72 OTS manual V12

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

lowact
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:05 am
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:
Australia

#36 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by lowact » Mon Mar 19, 2018 4:55 am

Woolfi wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:42 pm
Another interessting graph. It shows the typical torque curve of a motor, if he has 2 or 4 or 6 cylinders. The EV12 motor with carbs is acting like 4 connected 3-cylinder motors. The torque is higher than with the other two types of motor-construction and the maximum torque is in the low rev-range.
This is an interesting graph but maybe only relevant if the engines being compared are of the same capacity? E.g. 6L, 12x0.5L versus 6x1.0L versus 3x2.0L? Otherwise, if a V12E could act like 4x3cyl. it would also (simultaneously) act like 2x6cyl? Maybe it can only act like it is, a 1x12cyl engine.
Woolfi wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:42 pm
I have a EV12 with a 6,0 liter motor from a 1993 limousin and the original stromberg carbs. My friend has a very expensive EV12 with the same 6,0 l motor , but fuel injection. When we compared the cars accelerating from 2000 rpm in 4 gear, my stromberg-car was accelerating quicker than the injection car. The programming of the injection was done on a rolling road from a very experienced specialist in Germany, his name is Bilas. Bilas has done hundrets of coversions from original injection to programmed injection for sport cars in the last 20 years.
Therefore I am thinking, that a conversion to injection is nearly worthless.
EFI conversions enable programmable ecu. Logically there is no reason why a programmable ecu (efi and ignition) could not be made to deliver (at least) the same induction pattern as a carburetor induction system? If so, either Bilas was constrained or there are other factors? Also, with programmable ecu you can have multiple configurations, e.g. as well as yr “hero” configuration u could have a “tree-hugger” configuration. Can’t do that with carbs?
jagwit wrote:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:07 am
Model Engine HE Pre-HE Mods worth noting that could affect economy Ltrs L/100Km Km/L Mpg US Mpg UK
XJS Cab 5.3 X None 26.92 10.12 9.88 23.2 27.9
XJS-C 5.3 X None 27.06 10.17 9.83 23.1 27.7
E-type 5.3 X 11.5:1 HE, EFI, EDIS-6 Megasquirt ECU 30.78 11.57 8.64 20.3 24.4
DD6 5.3 X 82degC thermostats 31.32 11.77 8.49 20.0 24.0
DD6 5.3 X AJ6 Super Enhanced ECU 32.57 12.24 8.17 19.2 23.0
XJS 5.3 X EDIS-6, Megasquirt ECU, 5sp manual 29.82 11.21 8.92 21.0 25.2
E-type 5.3 X Upgraded ignition - no vacuum advance 34.35 12.91 7.74 18.2 21.8
This seems to be what I would expect: carb'd cars had the worst efficiency, factory EFI have the best efficiency, modified cars are in-between?
Regards,
ColinL
'72 OTS manual V12

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Woolfi
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:57 pm
Location: Germany
Germany

#37 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by Woolfi » Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:39 am

"This is an interesting graph but maybe only relevant if the engines being compared are of the same capacity? E.g. 6L, 12x0.5L versus 6x1.0L versus 3x2.0L? Otherwise, if a V12E could act like 4x3cyl. it would also (simultaneously) act like 2x6cyl? Maybe it can only act like it is, a 1x12cyl engine."

A carbed EV12 is BREATHING like 4 motors with three cylinder.
A EV12 with the original injection is breathing lige 2 six-cylinder motors.

Torque is produced by filling of the cylinder, NOT by the type of mixture-production (efi or carbs).
The graphs I have seen in a book about rising the power of motors, shows that the specific torque PER cubic inch of three-cylinder motor is higher than the specific torque of a six-cylinder motor PER cubic inch.
The graph also shows that the torque of the 3-cylinder motor is high in the area of lower revs, the torque of the 6 cylinder motor is higher at higher revs.
Therefore the specific max power of the 6 cylinder motor is higher than the specific max power of the 3 cylinder motor.

"EFI conversions enable programmable ecu. Logically there is no reason why a programmable ecu (efi and ignition) could not be made to deliver (at least) the same induction pattern as a carburetor induction system? If so, either Bilas was constrained or there are other factors? Also, with programmable ecu you can have multiple configurations, e.g. as well as yr “hero” configuration u could have a “tree-hugger” configuration. Can’t do that with carbs?"

Like I told it before: the EV12 with the original jag incection PLUS a programmable ecu is BREATHING in a different pattern like the original EV12 with 4 Stromberg carbs.

Like I told also before: OPEL has produced in the eighties a 6cyl 3,0 L injected motor with a "switchable" induction. Below 4000 rpm the motor swas breathing linke 3 cylinder injected motors. Above 4000 rpm the motor was breathing like one 6-cylinder motor in line. Why has Opel spent money and made effort for this construktion ? There was a butterfliy in the original 6-cyl "induction-box" to do separation of beathing of cylinder 1+2+3 and cyl 4+5+6 below 4000 rpm.

Regards Wolfgag Gatza

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Woolfi
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:57 pm
Location: Germany
Germany

#38 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by Woolfi » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:15 am

"For yr V12E to win out on paper you would need to increase output to at least 260 kW (350 hp). Those Webers should come close, stock V12E’s are intake limited, 6 monster Webers should fix that."

From where do you know this ? Have you calculated , how bis a racing carb inner diameter shall be for one EV12 435 ccm cylinder ? A 1,75 inch stromberg is a big carb. I have calculated the gas speed in a 2 inch SU carb at 6000 rpm at 1005 cylinder filling. The gas speed in the carb is very low, is lower than in a racing carbs for a racing motor. I have red an books about rising the power, that in a correct calibrated racing carb, the gas speed shall by 50 m/sec. Now you can calcultae, how well a bif SU would fit to the EV12 motor.
The 4,2L six has much bigger cylinders (700 ccm) . Therefore this motor needs a bigger carb than the V12 motor with 435 ccm per cylinder.

One feature of Webers that you might find attractive, they have fuel pumps, same as yr Edelbrock, so when you stomp the accelerator the mixture by enriched by boosting the petrol, giving a noticeable “shove-in the-back”. Unlike CD carbs (SU’s or Strombergs) which richen the mixture by throttling the air, so there is no sudden thrust, just a gradual build-up."
From where d0 you know this ? Dreamed when looking at 6 polishes weber carbs ? Have you ever tested this with a real compare of two EV12 , one with Weber one with Stromberg ?
Mr. Bywater himself told a friend of me, that the 6 Weber with short induction in the V of the EV12 motor will have a very bad specific torque at low and middle revs.

I have 4 Stromberg carbs, well tuned with a taylor-made needle by checking the mixture with a Lambda measuring system , NOT (!!!) with a rolling road. With a rolling road and a gas tester you can't check the mixture just in time, when pressing the pedal. There is allways a delay, depending on the length of the rubber hose to the gas tester. When my car is rolling at 600 rpm in first gear at idle, and the temperature is below 15 degrees Celsius (cold street), and I press the pedal immediately to the metall, after 1/10 second my back wheels are spinning , producing gray smoke and now acceleration. Can you tell me where there is a lack of sudden "shove in the back" ? My car has a Getrag which is shorter in the first gear that the original EV12 4-gear box. Therefore I don't want to compare apples with peaches.
Also in second or third gear the sudden "shove in the back" at revs between 2000 and 3000 RPM is impressing in my opinion.
Shure I think, that a injection on a EV12 motor is better than 4 Stromberg carbs. Idle, gas consumption, smell of exhaust gases and max power. But also I think, that the torque of the original carbed EV12 motor between 2000 and 4000 rpm is higher that the torque of the injected EV12 motor. This was my experience in REALITY with two tests against injected EV12 , which had the same displacement like my car. The result was very stunning for me, because I thought before we have done the test , it would be different.
I hope to do a third acceleration test againts a injected EV12 with 6,0 l motor, make a small video, put to youtube and show the link here.
My cousin has a Ferrari Daytona. He is a racer and drives the car hard. I still hope to make an accelaration test against from 30 - 140 mph against his car and make a video.
A compare in fourth gear from 2000 to 4000 rpm is easy to do. Why ia a owner of an injected EV12 is not doing such a test against a (well tuned) carbed Ev12 ? Science and fun in one act. Then the smoke will clear and we will know the truth.
Regards Wolfgang Gatza

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Woolfi
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:57 pm
Location: Germany
Germany

#39 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by Woolfi » Mon Mar 19, 2018 5:16 pm

6 Weber carbs with short pipes in the V are a wonderful idea. Look for carb-stand-off in youtube, When searching for carb and stand-off you will find more of this.
The stand-off is big, if each carb is feeding one cylinder. Weber produce a very good cylinder filling / torque, because each gas column is swinging. The frequency is deending of the length of the induction canal from mouth of the trumpet to the valve. If the frequency of this swinging is fitting to the rpm of the motor, the filling is best.
The length of the complete induction weber trumpet to valve is MUCH too short under the bonnet of the E-type, that the resulting frequency is fitting to the max revs of the EV12 motor.
Therefor the result will be bad.



Regards Wolfgang Gatza

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Woolfi
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:57 pm
Location: Germany
Germany

#40 Re: S3 V12 weber six pack carburettor set-up--any views?

Post by Woolfi » Mon Mar 19, 2018 5:31 pm

Short induction length vs. long induction length. From 5800 up the short induction length is producing mor power than the longer pipes. How much is a EV12 reving max ?
https://mechanics.stackexchange.com/que ... e-of-a-car

Regards Wolfgang Gatza

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic