Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
#1 Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
What does everyone think of this? Impressive power and torque figures if they’re accurate.
https://woodham-mortimer.com/Cars/For- ... d7c999c354
https://woodham-mortimer.com/Cars/For- ... d7c999c354
Tom
1970 S2 FHC
1970 S2 FHC
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
max-it-out
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:25 pm
- Location: South Lincs

#2 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Doesn`t say how much it costs ...
MPG probably not so good , that`s why it has a long range fuel tank .Should go quite well though with 400 bhp !
Mark
1968 series 1.5 roadster
1968 series 1.5 roadster
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#3 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Apparently, it’s £330k to £350k according to Octane.
Tom
1970 S2 FHC
1970 S2 FHC
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#4 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Would you buy a car from WM 
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#5 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Similar money would buy you a very nice one from Uryk at Evolution E types.
Interestingly one of the WM engine bay shots shows what appears to be another heater motor intake on the opposite side of the bulkhead? I'm assuming this is for AC?
Interestingly one of the WM engine bay shots shows what appears to be another heater motor intake on the opposite side of the bulkhead? I'm assuming this is for AC?
Simon
1969 S2 OTS
1969 S2 OTS
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#6 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Not sure about the AC bit Simon. Looking in the car it has the standard heater flaps and no under dash millboards. (Not keen on the interior though!).
Angus 67 FHC 1E33656
61 OTS 875047
61 OTS 875047
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#7 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Simon
1969 S2 OTS
1969 S2 OTS
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#8 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
I’m sure it goes beautifully
But just not my thing
I guess we all have our ideas of what it is about an etype that gets us excited...for me it’s the slim tyres and simple beauty of an early 3.8, with a moss box that requires a slow hand and a bit of thought
Robbie
But just not my thing
I guess we all have our ideas of what it is about an etype that gets us excited...for me it’s the slim tyres and simple beauty of an early 3.8, with a moss box that requires a slow hand and a bit of thought
Robbie
Robbie 1962 3.8 Coupe OSG 1962 OTS ODG
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#9 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
I don't know Simon. I agree, I would have thought it would be aircon but it would be unusual to use the standard flap vents inside the car. I can't see the compressor etc and there is no mention of it in the sales literature.
Angus 67 FHC 1E33656
61 OTS 875047
61 OTS 875047
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#10 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Isn’t this the company that bought the assets of JD Classics ?
Presumably the same established workshop team who worked on the restoration of the previous JD Classic cars, now focussing on the restoration and development of new products like this to showcase their skills.
Regards,
Dave
Presumably the same established workshop team who worked on the restoration of the previous JD Classic cars, now focussing on the restoration and development of new products like this to showcase their skills.
Regards,
Dave
Dave Rose
1967 Series 1 4.2 FHC
1967 Series 1 4.2 FHC
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
christopher storey
- Posts: 5698
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:07 pm
- Location: cheshire , england

#11 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Woodham Mortimer ? Now I wonder who they could be ?
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#12 Re: Woodham & Mortimer WM sport GT
Yes, Woodham & Mortimer rose from the remains of JD Classics.
I, for one, quite like this. It’s a bit more discrete than Eagle or Evolution E-types. Subtly changed, but still period. Removing the overriders is an interesting touch.
I’d love to know how they get those power and torque figures, and still retain decent low speed manners, especially on carbs.
I, for one, quite like this. It’s a bit more discrete than Eagle or Evolution E-types. Subtly changed, but still period. Removing the overriders is an interesting touch.
I’d love to know how they get those power and torque figures, and still retain decent low speed manners, especially on carbs.
Tom
1970 S2 FHC
1970 S2 FHC
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |




