Tracing an original engine
#1 Tracing an original engine
I know this is a long shot but I'm wondering if anyone has managed to track down an original engine block for a car with the wrong engine in.
My engine is not original. 7E 54221-9 has at some point in the past been replaced by 7R 1168-9, a series II engine. I've no documentation dating back before 1982 so suspect the engine was replaced sometime before then.
From my research the engine is essentially the same as the original, but it's not the original!! Searched the engine number on XKE Data, but only hit refers back to my entry.
Chances are the original was knackered and replaced, but if anyone has had any success with this kind of hunt, I'd welcome any advice on other search avenues.
Kev
My engine is not original. 7E 54221-9 has at some point in the past been replaced by 7R 1168-9, a series II engine. I've no documentation dating back before 1982 so suspect the engine was replaced sometime before then.
From my research the engine is essentially the same as the original, but it's not the original!! Searched the engine number on XKE Data, but only hit refers back to my entry.
Chances are the original was knackered and replaced, but if anyone has had any success with this kind of hunt, I'd welcome any advice on other search avenues.
Kev
1968 Series 1.5 2+2
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
PeterCrespin
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
- Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
- Contact:

#2
Jaguar Heritage archives can be searched by engine number. There will probably be a small fee but why not, since it supports their existence?
Pete
Pete
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#3 Re: Tracing an original engine
Probably because it was uneconomical to repair. Sadly, that probably means it went to the tip.kgb123 wrote: My engine is not original. 7E 54221-9 has at some point in the past been replaced by 7R 1168-9, a series II engine. I've no documentation dating back before 1982 so suspect the engine was replaced sometime before then.
From my research the engine is essentially the same as the original, but it's not the original!!
Kev
WRT it being the same as the original it is likely that your new engine is long stud not short stud. I'm not sure what visible external differences there are between the two block types.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
PeterCrespin
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
- Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
- Contact:

#4 Re: Tracing an original engine
All long stud blocks have a core plug at the base of the ten long studs, five per side. S3 XJ engines also have additional ribbing. The short stud blocks have fewer large plugs (three per side plus other odd ones IIRC).abowie wrote:WRT it being the same as the original it is likely that your new engine is long stud not short stud. I'm not sure what visible external differences there are between the two block types.
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#5
I knew someone would know!
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
PeterCrespin
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
- Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
- Contact:

#6
There are other traits and you can usually tell from any angle (length of head, plate at back of block etc.), but counting core plugs is definitive.
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#7
Thanks, will investigate the Jaguar Heritage suggestions and take a look at my core plugs. Just had the engine completely overhauled so everything is easily accessible and squeaky clean.
Kev
Kev
1968 Series 1.5 2+2
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
Dawnpatrol
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:09 pm
- Location: Lancashire

#8 Re: Tracing an original engine
[quote=
All long stud blocks have a core plug at the base of the ten long studs, five per side. S3 XJ engines also have additional ribbing. The short stud blocks have fewer large plugs (three per side plus other odd ones IIRC).[/quote]
I read your message above a few days ago Peter and thought I'd double check before replying.
Not all long stud blocks have 5 core plugs on the exhaust side.
My friends early Series 2 2+2 (late 68 build) is currently in strip down. The long studs are really knackered and we are having to use specialist milling gear to get them out.
Only 3 core plugs on exhaust side.
It is the cars original engine, has a series 1 oil filter housing which I've no reason to believe is not original to the engine.
Some sort of crossover point I think?
Regards.
All long stud blocks have a core plug at the base of the ten long studs, five per side. S3 XJ engines also have additional ribbing. The short stud blocks have fewer large plugs (three per side plus other odd ones IIRC).[/quote]
I read your message above a few days ago Peter and thought I'd double check before replying.
Not all long stud blocks have 5 core plugs on the exhaust side.
My friends early Series 2 2+2 (late 68 build) is currently in strip down. The long studs are really knackered and we are having to use specialist milling gear to get them out.
Only 3 core plugs on exhaust side.
It is the cars original engine, has a series 1 oil filter housing which I've no reason to believe is not original to the engine.
Some sort of crossover point I think?
Regards.
Michael
1961 OTS LWE, 1965 OTS, 1966 FHC.
1961 OTS LWE, 1965 OTS, 1966 FHC.
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#9 Re: Tracing an original engine
Personally I'd probably just find another block.Dawnpatrol wrote:[ The long studs are really knackered and we are having to use specialist milling gear to get them out.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
Dawnpatrol
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:09 pm
- Location: Lancashire

#10
My previous career was Aeronautical Engineering, so, for the moment, there is more "fun" to be had messing with the original and it will be quite satisfying if it can be recovered.
IMO, keeping the original has to be worth it......
However it may run out our patience
IMO, keeping the original has to be worth it......
However it may run out our patience
Michael
1961 OTS LWE, 1965 OTS, 1966 FHC.
1961 OTS LWE, 1965 OTS, 1966 FHC.
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
PeterCrespin
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
- Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
- Contact:

#11
If someone has a long stud block in front of them, with only three core plugs on the exhaust side, then it's clear there must have been some kind of transitional block. Since many (daren't say 'all') relevant blocks have a date cast into them it would be interesting to know when it was cast and ehat the cast part number was. The various versions will doubtless be traceable through part number listings but my eyes glaze over at the unillustrated pages of part numbers one sees for S1.5/2 models.
My long stroke block needed a helicoil but I wouldn't fancy repairing a block 'blind' without a core plug.
My long stroke block needed a helicoil but I wouldn't fancy repairing a block 'blind' without a core plug.
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
Dawnpatrol
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:09 pm
- Location: Lancashire

#12
OK. Embarrassing duff info retraction and apologies to Peter.
(PM on its way.)
Due to a combination of crossed wires and pictures of the wrong block I was wrong about this block only having 3 core plugs, it has 5 on the exhaust side, as per Peters original post.
I went to the engineering shop get the casting date to pass on and realised the photo error.
Teach me to check thrice not twice.
Off to eat some more humble pie.
Dons tin hat etc!
Due to a combination of crossed wires and pictures of the wrong block I was wrong about this block only having 3 core plugs, it has 5 on the exhaust side, as per Peters original post.
I went to the engineering shop get the casting date to pass on and realised the photo error.
Teach me to check thrice not twice.
Off to eat some more humble pie.
Dons tin hat etc!
Michael
1961 OTS LWE, 1965 OTS, 1966 FHC.
1961 OTS LWE, 1965 OTS, 1966 FHC.
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
PeterCrespin
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
- Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
- Contact:

#13
No sweat, thanks for reporting back for the record.
So long as you didn't have to eat regular doses of HP in your previous aeronautical career! ;-)
So long as you didn't have to eat regular doses of HP in your previous aeronautical career! ;-)
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |




