Front ride height

Technical advice Q&A
User avatar

Topic author
pip007
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

#1 Front ride height

Post by pip007 » Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:39 pm

Just had front suspension overhauled on 1970 S2 coupe. Car is now sitting about an inch or so lower than it was previously at the nose. Garage says ride hight is correct but now the bonnet hits the ground when opened so it is clearly wrong. Can anyone tell me what the correct distance should be between the ground and the top of the front wheel arch?

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Heuer
Administrator
Posts: 15157
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:29 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire
Great Britain

#2

Post by Heuer » Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:57 pm

All E-Type bonnet's hit the ground when opened!

You can adjust the front ride height via the torsion bars:
Image
Image

The important height is A in the first diagram which should be 8 3/4" under the stated conditions. If you are going to mess with the height frequently then it is worth buying the Rob Beere reaction plate which makes the job simple: http://www.rob-beere-racing.co.uk/suspension.html#react
David Jones
S1 OTS OSB
1997 Porsche 911 Guards Red
2024 Lexus LBX

Add your E-Type to our World Map: http://forum.etypeuk.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1810

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
pip007
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

#3 Thanks

Post by pip007 » Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:08 pm

Thanks for the quick reply. I'll check the 8.75" measurement you mention.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


christopher storey
Posts: 5698
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: cheshire , england
Great Britain

#4

Post by christopher storey » Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:16 pm

David ( and Pip) : I hate to nit pick, but for series 2 cars the correct height of the datum is 9 inches minimum - for reasons I do not wholly understand the + or - was abandoned. See page JY.s.1 of the manual

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
pip007
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

#5

Post by pip007 » Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:21 pm

Thanks Christopher. I just measured the dimension ("A") and it is only 6.5" on my car. So (as I suspected) front end is about 2" low. Back to the workshop it goes!

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


jfjharry
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Australia

#6

Post by jfjharry » Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:25 am

Just noticed the ride heights problems you've had. I have a '73 V12 e-type. I have exactly the same problem as I have taken one side apart and inserted the measuring gauge intoo the damper position and it measures virtually spot on. My car at the front is 2" lower than it should be. Did you have any more information on yours and maybe I can learn from it.
Harry

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
pip007
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

#7

Post by pip007 » Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:18 pm

Thanks for your note Harry. No developments just yet, though in the spring I plan to have another look at it. car was originally low on one side (about an inch). I had some front end work done and car ended up equal on both sides but about 1.5" low over all at front. They were in a rush to get it done! I took it back and car is now back to normal height, but still about 1/2 inch low on one side. There's probably no real mystery (other than why the mechanic can't seem to get it right). It seems to be a torsion bar adjustment issue. Nothing worse than a car that leans to one side! Just looks awful!

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Moeregaard
Posts: 763
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:23 pm
Location: Thousand Oaks, California
United States of America

#8

Post by Moeregaard » Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:37 pm

The reason for Series Two cars' increased ride height was to comply with U.S. headlamp height regulations. At least this has been the commonly accepted theory, since the underpinnings remained unchanged from the Series One.
Mark (Moe) Shipley
Former owner '66FHC, #1E32208
Former owner '65FHC, #1E30036

Planning on getting E-Type No. 3 as soon as possible....

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Erikantwerp
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 1:36 pm
Location: Antwerp,Belgium
Belgium

#9

Post by Erikantwerp » Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:32 pm

Only indirectly related but still, is it true that ride height of a series one 3.8 was different from a series one 4.2 ?

Many thx
Erik
Erik Antwerp
1966 S1 4.2 FHC,Belgium

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
pip007
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

#10

Post by pip007 » Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:27 am

Hmmm, that might explain why the workshop set it too low. The guy that id the work has a 3.8. I noticed just yesterday that his front end is lower than mine.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic