Some additional information. The switch, sourced from SNGB, is made by Lucas. Stamped right on it. It is dimensionally nearly identical to the original dated 1962 that came from my choke. The most critical to me is the vertical height of the switch casing and the new one is marginally shorter than the original! Here's pics:
It has been noted on the Jag-Lovers website in a similar thread as this that the spring latch is somewhat different from the original. The ending is longer than the original it appears and the width of the new spring is also wider. There's opportunity to mount the spring vertically by trimming the end off. I shall leave mine mounted sideways and while (okay, whilst) I could narrow it I shall leave it alone.
While I had both switches out, I measured them electrically. The switches should have 0 ohms when relaxed and when the end button is pushed in it should have continuity. Well the new one does: 0 ohms out and 1.4 ohms in. The old one is sporadic I am sad to discover. Sometimes when relaxed it goes to 0, but often it settles on some high megaohm number. When pushed in, it shows some continuity but at more than 100 ohms. As I said, it is erratic. So, the old switch is not working properly and I shall dismember it in the hopes I can clean its contacts.
Also a picture of the handbrake mounted without the switch. In remounting the handbrake so as to take a picture without the switch, I noted the front, threaded holes line up well, but the rear holes in the handbrake frame do not align exactly with the slots in the rear bracket to which the handbrake mounts. It requires a bit of persuasion to get the bolts to go into the fore/aft slotted holes in the rear mounting bracket. And the stress is caused by the need to force the rear of the handbrake downwards in order to slip the bolts through the rear brackets holes! So, the rear bracket was perhaps welded to the tunnel a bit lower than called for. And for me, that means I can wallow out those slots a bit so as to raise the rear of the handbrake. That alone will solve this problem I do believe. Pics:
More later.