Rev counter precision
- 
				Philippe-J.
 Topic author
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:14 pm
- Location: Occitanie
 
#1 Rev counter precision
Guys,
I tested my rev counter sender on the bench, rotating it with my column drill at different speeds:
I noted that the reading is 8% overestimated, except at 5300 RPM where it's perfect.
Question: what is the expected precision for the engine rev reading? Should it be better than 8%? Is it worth sophisticating my test, e.g. with a rev counter instrument to check the drill speed? And to have my instrument re-calibrated?
Thanks for your ideas.
							I tested my rev counter sender on the bench, rotating it with my column drill at different speeds:
I noted that the reading is 8% overestimated, except at 5300 RPM where it's perfect.
Question: what is the expected precision for the engine rev reading? Should it be better than 8%? Is it worth sophisticating my test, e.g. with a rev counter instrument to check the drill speed? And to have my instrument re-calibrated?
Thanks for your ideas.
- Attachments
- 
			
		
				- rev_test.jpg (88.67 KiB) Viewed 764 times
 
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
#2 Re: Rev counter precision
If you dont know your drill speed then you can't tell how accurate your rev counter is...led rev counter testers are cheep...and will measure your drill revs accurately....Steve...ps you then determine if the problem is the generator by measuring ng the voltage or the rev counter
			
									
									Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
			69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
#3 Re: Rev counter precision
I remember there is a phone app to measure rpm from the days I flew rc helicopters
			
									
									Danny
1962 S1 3.8 FHC (1012/1798)
2015 Range Rover Sport SVR
"Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."
			1962 S1 3.8 FHC (1012/1798)
2015 Range Rover Sport SVR
"Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
- 
				Philippe-J.
 Topic author
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:14 pm
- Location: Occitanie
 
#4 Re: Rev counter precision
Thank you for your advise.
I do imagine they are solutions to check my set up. My question is whether it is worth doing so, as my test shows a discrepancy of 8%, with two unknows (more or less): the drill rev and the tachometer. As it is unlikely that their respective inaccuracies are huge and compensate, I can assume that my tachometer is accurate to better than 8%. Is this actually much worse than the expected precision of a nominal tachometer reading in an E Type?
			
									
									
			I do imagine they are solutions to check my set up. My question is whether it is worth doing so, as my test shows a discrepancy of 8%, with two unknows (more or less): the drill rev and the tachometer. As it is unlikely that their respective inaccuracies are huge and compensate, I can assume that my tachometer is accurate to better than 8%. Is this actually much worse than the expected precision of a nominal tachometer reading in an E Type?
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
#5 Re: Rev counter precision
There is no accuracy spec in the servic manual....My reply was how do you get 8% when you don't know your drill speed?....is the inaccuracy unaceptable to you..if yes then test it all and have it recalibrated..Steve..ps have you checked the voltage output at the generator across the rev range.....
			
									
									Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
			69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
#6 Re: Rev counter precision
The tachometer when brand new with a brand new generator should have been pretty accurate. I’d expect it to be a couple of percent perhaps. 
Your 60 year old generator and AC voltmeter however.. less so
I would have thought that 8% error was pretty good. However whether it’s adequate for your engine or not is another question.
Personally I’d buy a $20 digital tachometer from EBay and set it up so you can compare what your tachometer says with reality. Then you can decide whether it is good enough.
You can have the tachometer upgraded to run directly off the coil signal. This removes the generator from the equation.
			
									
									Your 60 year old generator and AC voltmeter however.. less so
I would have thought that 8% error was pretty good. However whether it’s adequate for your engine or not is another question.
Personally I’d buy a $20 digital tachometer from EBay and set it up so you can compare what your tachometer says with reality. Then you can decide whether it is good enough.
You can have the tachometer upgraded to run directly off the coil signal. This removes the generator from the equation.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
			881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
- 
				Philippe-J.
 Topic author
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:14 pm
- Location: Occitanie
 
#7 Re: Rev counter precision
That's two interesting replies, thanks.
- to check the voltage output from the generator. I remember indications of this voltage as a function of the RPM. I just have to find them again, I don't remember where that was 
 
- compared to Andrew's 2% estimate for a new stuff, I find that 8% is not bad but not excellent. I guess it's enough to drive, but worth checking with a 15E rev counter and Steve's idea.
At least, I now know that the magnets in the generator are not tired, nor the counter stuck, which I feared, I must confess
			
									
									
			- to check the voltage output from the generator. I remember indications of this voltage as a function of the RPM. I just have to find them again, I don't remember where that was
 
 - compared to Andrew's 2% estimate for a new stuff, I find that 8% is not bad but not excellent. I guess it's enough to drive, but worth checking with a 15E rev counter and Steve's idea.
At least, I now know that the magnets in the generator are not tired, nor the counter stuck, which I feared, I must confess

| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
#8 Re: Rev counter precision
Details in service manual electric/instrument section.. ac generator 1volt/100revs
			
									
									Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
			69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
- 
				Philippe-J.
 Topic author
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:14 pm
- Location: Occitanie
 
#9 Re: Rev counter precision
Thank you Steve, I found it, that's the info I needed (even though it is given "as a rough guide"   . So back to my initial question: how much is "rough"? )
. So back to my initial question: how much is "rough"? )
			
									
									
			 . So back to my initial question: how much is "rough"? )
. So back to my initial question: how much is "rough"? )| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
- 
				Philippe-J.
 Topic author
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:14 pm
- Location: Occitanie
 
#11 Re: Rev counter precision
In my case, "rough" is  a "very rough" 1 Vac per cam rpm's. So I ordered a rev counter to make it clear. Then I'll know.
			
									
									
			| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
- 
				Philippe-J.
 Topic author
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:14 pm
- Location: Occitanie
 
#12 Re: Rev counter precision
I eventually got my remote rev counter (for E 12, including postage  ) and the measurements are much clearer. They exhibit the true rpm of my drill, that, compared to the rev instrument reading, is +/- 2 % away from it at low speed. Only the 5500 RPM is under estimated by 4 % by the instrument.
 ) and the measurements are much clearer. They exhibit the true rpm of my drill, that, compared to the rev instrument reading, is +/- 2 % away from it at low speed. Only the 5500 RPM is under estimated by 4 % by the instrument.
I think I can live with it, can't I?
			
									
									
			 ) and the measurements are much clearer. They exhibit the true rpm of my drill, that, compared to the rev instrument reading, is +/- 2 % away from it at low speed. Only the 5500 RPM is under estimated by 4 % by the instrument.
 ) and the measurements are much clearer. They exhibit the true rpm of my drill, that, compared to the rev instrument reading, is +/- 2 % away from it at low speed. Only the 5500 RPM is under estimated by 4 % by the instrument.I think I can live with it, can't I?
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
#13 Re: Rev counter precision
When I had my car rolling road tested many years ago, I was advised that the rev counter was 8-10% optimistic, so I just live with it
 .
.
			
									
									1950 XK120
1965 S1 E Type DHC (ex 2 BBC)
1989 Porsche 911 Carrera cabriolet
			1965 S1 E Type DHC (ex 2 BBC)
1989 Porsche 911 Carrera cabriolet
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links | 
- 
				Philippe-J.
 Topic author
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 12:14 pm
- Location: Occitanie
 








