Rear wishbones

Technical advice Q&A
User avatar

Topic author
Simonpfhc
Posts: 775
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#1 Rear wishbones

Post by Simonpfhc » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:05 pm

Hi all,

Just building up the components on the IRS. i have the diff mounted and brackets aligned. Calipers, discs and driveshafts are on. I am about to mount the wishbones. The manual just states to make sure that the mounts for the trailing arms are pointing forwards. However, depending on which side you fit a wishbone, the grease nipples (on the inside bearings) may be pointing upwards or downwards. Now, my photos at disassembly clearly show the grease nipples pointing upwards, but in all the pictures online that I have found, the grease nipples point downwards. If they point downwards, it seems more logical for access, but they are slightly obscured by the tie plate that bolts across the cage. Upwards they are not obscured by anything, but are more awkward for access.

Is there a correct orientation?

Cheers.
Simon
62 3.8 FHC
91 Porsche 928GT
Find me on Instagram and Facebook @oldcarfixer

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

PeterCrespin
Posts: 4561
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Contact:
United States of America

#2

Post by PeterCrespin » Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:36 pm

Down of course. They weren't obscured for the Tecalemit toolkit grease gun.
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 9135
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#3

Post by mgcjag » Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:44 pm

Hi Simon....The nippies should be pointing down..You can .use.straight nippies or adjust the angled ones to a position where access is easier.....check with the bottom plate which looks best....maybe they were fitted the wrong way around before... Steve
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Simonpfhc
Posts: 775
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#4

Post by Simonpfhc » Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:57 pm

Thanks guys - down it is then.

Looks like they were fitted incorrectly at some point then (shick, horror!!)

Cheers.
Simon
62 3.8 FHC
91 Porsche 928GT
Find me on Instagram and Facebook @oldcarfixer

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

BRM
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:00 am
Location: Essex
Great Britain

#5

Post by BRM » Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:22 pm

You're not alone there. My car has just spent several weeks with Angus for other work during which time we discovered with similar horror that my wishbones had been fitted at some time previously on the wrong sides ie. upside down with the grease nipples on the top. More expense !

Due to the offset on the inner ends of the wishbones, fitting them upside down means that the wishbone sits at a greater angle to the horizontal than it should which must marginally raise the ride height and also means the brackets for the trailing arms are at the wrong angle and distort the rubber bushes.

Brian
Brian

1969 S2 FHC 1R20267
1960 Austin Healey 3000

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Simonpfhc
Posts: 775
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#6

Post by Simonpfhc » Fri Aug 28, 2015 7:21 am

Glad I asked and averted a disaster! Good that you are getting yours sorted ;-)

Interesting that it affects the ride height. It must also affect the camber then?? When dismantled, there were 4 spacers on the driveshafts each side, so I may just fit a couple and see how it measures up.

Cheers.
Simon
62 3.8 FHC
91 Porsche 928GT
Find me on Instagram and Facebook @oldcarfixer

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


JagWaugh
Posts: 559
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 12:56 pm
Location: Eglisau, Switzerland
Switzerland

#7

Post by JagWaugh » Fri Aug 28, 2015 7:37 am

Simon,

Camber will only be affected by the C-C distance of the shaft bores, these are the same either way. It affects ride height because there is a slight crank to the ends, and this moves the lower shock/spring mounting.

Andrew

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Simonpfhc
Posts: 775
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#8

Post by Simonpfhc » Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:58 am

Hi Andrew,

Good to know, thanks.

Cheers.
Simon
62 3.8 FHC
91 Porsche 928GT
Find me on Instagram and Facebook @oldcarfixer

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic