#1 Running AvGas LL100
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 8:27 pm
Just wondered how many people out there are running leaded AvGas LL100 as an additive in their fuel - at around a 10% mix with their regular unleaded petrol ?
With the withdrawal of leaded fuel for cars in the UK many years ago, as a form of insurance and peace of mind I have used a lead replacement petrol additive, but these are becoming harder to find and increasingly more expensive - especially the Castrol Valvemaster with the extra octane. AvGas LL100 is a 100 octane fuel - but rated on the Motor Octane Number (MON) method, which would make it on the car-orientated Research Octane Method (RON) around 108 to 110 octane points - or Nine Star to us land dwelling car users. The "LL" means "low-lead" - but only "low" in the sense of other aviation fuels which could contain up to 1g/litre - whereas in practice LL100 contains lead at around 0.4g to 0.5/litre.
Our local airfield sells it at ?1.69/litre, which bearing in mind you are adding 10% to your fuel rather than a small additive, does not seem so bad. With the other advantages of a long life and not going "off" in storage and not gumming up needle valves, many people use it in lawnmowers and generators. Also if you spill it on yourself, you don't reek of petrol for ages.
I understand an issue around lack of tax and therefore it should not be used exclusively as a fuel or on public roads, but with other users out there, do they have views on it being used increasingly as an additive by the classic car fraternity ?
regards,
Dave
With the withdrawal of leaded fuel for cars in the UK many years ago, as a form of insurance and peace of mind I have used a lead replacement petrol additive, but these are becoming harder to find and increasingly more expensive - especially the Castrol Valvemaster with the extra octane. AvGas LL100 is a 100 octane fuel - but rated on the Motor Octane Number (MON) method, which would make it on the car-orientated Research Octane Method (RON) around 108 to 110 octane points - or Nine Star to us land dwelling car users. The "LL" means "low-lead" - but only "low" in the sense of other aviation fuels which could contain up to 1g/litre - whereas in practice LL100 contains lead at around 0.4g to 0.5/litre.
Our local airfield sells it at ?1.69/litre, which bearing in mind you are adding 10% to your fuel rather than a small additive, does not seem so bad. With the other advantages of a long life and not going "off" in storage and not gumming up needle valves, many people use it in lawnmowers and generators. Also if you spill it on yourself, you don't reek of petrol for ages.
I understand an issue around lack of tax and therefore it should not be used exclusively as a fuel or on public roads, but with other users out there, do they have views on it being used increasingly as an additive by the classic car fraternity ?
regards,
Dave