Trickle charger, yes or no

Technical advice Q&A

Topic author
guyjohnwood@aol.com
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:32 pm

#1 Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by guyjohnwood@aol.com » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:42 pm

Dear all,

I have historically used a trickle charger mainly when the car is locked up for most of winter. Recently a friend of mine suggested that they should be avoided if possible. I am minded to carry on using one, but would welcome comments.

Regards,

Guy

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

andrewh
Posts: 2557
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:31 am
Location: kent
Great Britain

#2

Post by andrewh » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:00 pm

Does your friend actually know why? Does he/you mean a trickle charger or a conditioner? A little knowledge is a dangerous thing as the saying goes!
1962 3.8 Series One FHC

http://etype860897.blogspot.com/

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


adam
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:11 pm
Great Britain

#3

Post by adam » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:09 pm

I have used a C TEK battery conditioner for seven years on my car no problems.Still the same battery in all that time.

Adam

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Gfhug
Posts: 3305
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:08 pm
Location: Near Andover, Hampshire,in D.O. Blighty
Great Britain

#4

Post by Gfhug » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:58 pm

One idea is to not leave the trickle charger on all the time, but to have it on a timer switch to be on for a few hours each day.
Have done this with my aeroplane over winter for several years and battery was in fine fettle each spring.
Just a suggestion
S2 FHC Light Blue
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

andrewh
Posts: 2557
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:31 am
Location: kent
Great Britain

#5

Post by andrewh » Sun Dec 27, 2015 10:04 pm

I think the key here is the description trickle. A trickle charge is completely different from a conditioner which exercises the battery in a way which replicates normal use. This reduces the build up of sulphur between the plates from a static battery. As I understand it a trickle charge does not achieve this .
1962 3.8 Series One FHC

http://etype860897.blogspot.com/

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

trondvo
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:59 am
Location: Norway
Norway

#6

Post by trondvo » Mon Dec 28, 2015 12:26 am

It is wise to have a maintenace plan, from my experience automotive batteries need be used regularily to last and good batteries are getting expensive. Changing them out after 2-3 years due to little use / bad charge pattern is bad economy.

The cost to buy a good battery is much higher than that of a good conditioner/smart charger.

Recently bought a set of Noco smart chargers (1100mah) and will probably get one of the G4 model they have as well the 3500mah one with "repair modus to desulfate a bad battery".

https://no.co/products/charging

Spent time to look at the alternatives but decided to buy NOCO due to their price and lots of positive reviews. You get 2-3 for the price of one CTEK. (Amazon have NOCO at better prices than their website). Norway is a 220V country and a cheap stepdown transformer is used to run the 115V NOCO chargers.

I always take out batteries for winter or long term storage and use the smart chargers about every 2 months and leave them charging for the weekend. They may be left in 24/7 though.
61 OTS Black on Red, 62 FHC nuts & bolts resto on the way to OSG & Matador red.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

malcolm
Posts: 2393
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:44 am
Location: Fleet
Great Britain

#7

Post by malcolm » Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:05 am

I've got an optimate 6 and swear by it. Doesn't permanently trickle charge, but permanently monitors and trickle charges when needed to keep battery up. Also, it will "recover" a battery with a series of high voltage blasts for very short periods to de sulphate if necessary. Just leave it permanently plugged in and it decides what to do and when to do it. I used an earlier version of optimate on a motorbike battery. Being so small, they have a notoriously short life. Mine was fine when I sold my bike with battery 10 years old.
Malcolm
I only fit in a 2+2, so got one!
1969 Series 2 2+2
2009 Jaguar XF-S
2015 F Type V6 S

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Eadib
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 1:58 pm
Location: USA
United States of America

#8 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by Eadib » Mon Oct 18, 2021 2:34 am

I have been using Ctec maintainers for years with no problems whatsoever.
Ed
‘74 E-Type roadster, ‘66 Austin-Healey 3000, 2006 Ferrari F430 gated manual, 2015 Ferrari F-12

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Robsan
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:48 pm
Location: Cleveland UK
Great Britain

#9 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by Robsan » Mon Oct 18, 2021 8:19 am

Another vote for the C tek from me................. Its more than a trickle and exercises the battery too :smile:

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

caveman
Posts: 487
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:55 am
Great Britain

#10 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by caveman » Mon Oct 18, 2021 7:55 pm

:yeahthat: on my modern cars and an air chamber version on the ‘E’. First battery lasted 14years so I’m definitely a fan of conditioners. The CTEK is ££ but worth every penny when used with modern stop/start batteries which can be costly to replace. I payed over £400 for a modern battery before CTEK purchase and hopefully increased longevity.
Steve
1965 S1 4.2 FHC (early)

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


cactusman
Posts: 2338
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:09 pm
Location: Hertfordshire
Great Britain

#11 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by cactusman » Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:05 am

Constant trickle charging is not good...battery conditioners very good. I have a c tek...
Julian the E-type man
1962 FHC
1966 MGB....fab little car too

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


dlgis
Posts: 430
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2021 9:20 am
Location: Kent
Great Britain

#12 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by dlgis » Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:55 pm

Hi all, Having just bought a series 1 i had hoped to be able to put it on my ctek 5.0 from time to time. Then i realised the car is positive earth so presumably i would have to disconnect the battery before connecting the ctek?

Darryl
Darryl
1964 S1 FHC 3.8 opalescent maroon

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Gfhug
Posts: 3305
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:08 pm
Location: Near Andover, Hampshire,in D.O. Blighty
Great Britain

#13 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by Gfhug » Sun Oct 24, 2021 6:17 pm

Or over winter convert to negative earth? Worth thinking of doing this with your new car. And welcome to the best place for all things E Type

Geoff
S2 FHC Light Blue
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 8091
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#14 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by mgcjag » Sun Oct 24, 2021 6:42 pm

Darryl...your charger dosent know what polarity a vehicle is....so long as you connect the pos lead to battery pos and neg lead the battery neg it will work ok.......Steve
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (just sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


dlgis
Posts: 430
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2021 9:20 am
Location: Kent
Great Britain

#15 Re: Trickle charger, yes or no

Post by dlgis » Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:03 pm

Aha thanks, thats nice and straightforward then :smile:
Darryl
1964 S1 FHC 3.8 opalescent maroon

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic