I had a quick look at the pistons on my rear brakes earlier today. Three of the 4 pistons were well corroded, so it looks as though it's replacements for all.
I read on the forum that some members have used the front 2-1/8 on the rear when they've uprated the fronts to 4 pots because it brings front/rear balance closer to design.
As I need to buy new for the rear, is it advisable to go 2-1/8 or stick with the standard size.
I've have zeus 4 pots for the front.
Advise would be appreciated.
Alun
Rear brakes
#2 Re: Rear brakes
Have a look at these https://mossmotors.com/8777-2-cp-cobalt ... t_products
WRT balance calculate your front caliper total piston area, then see which of the available sizes gets you closest.
The stock calipers have 60% front bias.
WRT balance calculate your front caliper total piston area, then see which of the available sizes gets you closest.
The stock calipers have 60% front bias.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#3 Re: Rear brakes
Alum Wrote:
I can't see that at all working. The rear brake caliper incorporates the Hand Brake mount, which is not included on the front brake caliper.
Regards,
Bill
Hello Alum,I read on the forum that some members have used the front 2-1/8 on the rear when they've uprated the fronts to 4 pots because it brings front/rear balance closer to design.
I can't see that at all working. The rear brake caliper incorporates the Hand Brake mount, which is not included on the front brake caliper.
Regards,
Bill
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#4 Re: Rear brakes
It does. You just put the 2 1/8" cylinders on the rear caliper body.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#5 Re: Rear brakes
Hi Bill,
Yes it should work. I've checked the cylinders and the fronts (2-1/8) do physically fit the rear. Awaiting information from zeus about the size of their 4 pots.
Has a done done this already.
Alun
Yes it should work. I've checked the cylinders and the fronts (2-1/8) do physically fit the rear. Awaiting information from zeus about the size of their 4 pots.
Has a done done this already.
Alun
Al
Series 1, 2+2
undergoing renovation
Series 1, 2+2
undergoing renovation
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#6 Re: Rear brakes
Yes this is what I did when I fitted Coopercraft front calipers to my first E Type years ago. Moving the fronts to the rear maintained the brake bias at stock.
To be honest though I really couldn't feel any difference with the braking for day to day driving.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#7 Re: Rear brakes
Does the S2 rear system offer any volume change?
Sean
S1 2+2 1966 BW RHD
XK120 1954 comp LHD
S1 2+2 1966 BW RHD
XK120 1954 comp LHD
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |




