Rear Suspension woes..

Talk about the E-Type Series 3
User avatar

Topic author
JaggyWag
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:16 pm
Location: Harrogate

#1 Rear Suspension woes..

Post by JaggyWag » Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:38 pm

Greetings All, new on here but have been grappling with a S3 2+2 for the last year! It is 40 years old and off the road for the last 20 years. I think Peter C's helpful book warns against buying someone else's problems, but I think it's a case of 'I've started so I'll finish'..! I'd very much appreciate a bit of advice from anyone who can help, please?

Car in for wheel alignment checks and have discovered that the OSR is a long way out and cannot be adjusted (probably explains why the car is hard to push!) Thinking is that the rear subframe is bent, suggestive of the car being 'kerbed' hard at OSR wheel but hard to see any structural damage underneath with the naked eye. Anyone had a similar experience please? Is this a common occurrence? If I have to fit a new subframe, I gather that XJ6 and XJS frames will fit. I have located the latter but think it is a later version with outboard brake discs. Does anyone know if this will fit my car, please? Most grateful for any thoughts!

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1750
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#2

Post by MarekH » Sun Dec 01, 2013 3:23 pm

Dear Anon,

No they won't fit. You'd want a subframe from an old s-type (or perhaps a 420G also - I'm sure someone else will chime in). Use the search facility to confirm that. Also note that the carrier between the differential and lower arms is probably different for those cars so you'd need to keep hold of your own one.

New cages are also available.
Feel free to use a real name - this is more MFI than MI5.

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Heuer
Administrator
Posts: 15157
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:29 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire
Great Britain

#3

Post by Heuer » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:03 pm

When you say a "long way out" - how much? This is the alignment report on my FHC: http://etypeuk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4991 where the rear left toe is 3.7mm compared to 0.4mm on the right. The camber is within specifications but there is no published toe specification for the rear because there is no adjustment. However it is generally accepted that 4mm of total toe in at the rear is about right for the road. Excessive toe increases tyre scuffing and results in tyre wear and drag on the vehicle. Excessive toe-in, or positive toe, increases scuffing on the outside of the tyre. Excessive toe-out, or negative toe, increases scuffing on the inside of the tyre, and in some cases can cause a wandering problem.
Last edited by Heuer on Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
David Jones
S1 OTS OSB
1997 Porsche 911 Guards Red
2024 Lexus LBX

Add your E-Type to our World Map: http://forum.etypeuk.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1810

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
JaggyWag
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:16 pm
Location: Harrogate

#4

Post by JaggyWag » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:31 pm

Thanks Marek, the name is Peter by the way, the tag dates to when my daughter first tried to say 'Jaguar' and that is how it came out - hence I am quite attached to the name!

So, to be clear, the only frame that will fit is the S-Type and not the XJ6 or XJS with the inboard discs?

Such as this one maybe:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/JAGUAR-420-S- ... 1c394ec093

Many thanks for your kind assistance.

Peter

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
JaggyWag
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:16 pm
Location: Harrogate

#5

Post by JaggyWag » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:43 pm

David

That's actually very helpful, thanks, as I can refer these points (including those from Pete) to the garage carrying out the work.

Can't remember what they said about how far out it was, will ask them. Interesting thing is that all the signs are that the rear frame was taken out by the previous owner as the mountings look new, although I don't think the trailing arm bushes have been changed.

Many thanks.

Peter

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


tinworm
Posts: 610
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:48 am
Location: devon
Great Britain

#6

Post by tinworm » Sun Dec 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Hi , a possibility for consideration is the radius arm turret position (turret welded to floor ) as if this was positioned too far forward this would have the effect of pulling the axle around on its rubber mounts - this could be enough to affect the toe -in on that side . This sort of thing can happen to a car that has had new floors fitted.

regards Barrie
1968 E-type roadster, 1964 E-type fixed head 1995 Ferrari 355 1980 Ferrari 308 1987 V8 90 Landrover 1988 Bedford rascal van 1943 Ford GPW

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1750
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#7

Post by MarekH » Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:12 pm

Dear Peter,

Don't necessarily believe that an ebayed cage will be better than your own - there is a reason why stuff ends up on ebay - it's because the current owner doesn't want it.

I'd investigate where the geometry mismatch comes from first. As already pointed out, it may not be the cage.

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Heuer
Administrator
Posts: 15157
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:29 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire
Great Britain

#8

Post by Heuer » Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:24 pm

Agree with Marek - if it is the cage it is likely both sides will be out, if one side then the trailing arm would be the suspect. See if you can get hold of the alignment measurement report and post it here.
David Jones
S1 OTS OSB
1997 Porsche 911 Guards Red
2024 Lexus LBX

Add your E-Type to our World Map: http://forum.etypeuk.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1810

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Alty Ian
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:24 am
Location: Cheshire
Great Britain

#9

Post by Alty Ian » Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:02 pm

Hi Peter

The rear frames can be very difficult to get back in straight especially if any work has been done to the radius arm mounts etc. I wouldnt just assume its bent, more likely its incorrectly fitted, You need an accurate survey and measurements to work out whats happening.

cheers Ian
64 S1 4.2 OTS 1E10012 73 S3 2+2 manual 2013 V6 F type OTS

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

PeterCrespin
Posts: 4561
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Contact:
United States of America

#10 Re: Rear Suspension woes..

Post by PeterCrespin » Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:41 pm

JaggyWag wrote:
Car in for wheel alignment checks and have discovered that the OSR is a long way out and cannot be adjusted (probably explains why the car is hard to push!) Thinking is that the rear subframe is bent, suggestive of the car being 'kerbed' hard at OSR wheel but hard to see any structural damage underneath with the naked eye. Anyone had a similar experience please?
Please to essplain what or how she is 'long way out'?

The important and hard-to-fix parameter can be checked in two minutes with a tape measure. Take the hub centre to hub centre distance, or rim edge to rim edge if you're feeling lazy or have no help. It hardly matters which points you measure to/from because the only issue is how different the two same measurements are. If the wheelbase-type reading is the same then I assume you're talking about camber? There would have to be a pretty humungous wheelbase difference to make a car hard to push IMO and no amount of camber difference would matter to pushing. For the wheelbase to be smacked out of line to the point of making the car hard to push, you'd see with the naked eye that one wheel was displaced in the wheel arch or the two wheels seemed distinctly different fore and aft in their arches.

Skidding sideways on ice or oil and smacking a kerb hard with one back wheel can do nasty damage if you suspect a trauma cause, but first I'd need to know what is is that's a long way out.

Pete
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
JaggyWag
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:16 pm
Location: Harrogate

#11

Post by JaggyWag » Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:55 am

Thanks to everyone for the helpful observations. Will try to get the measurements and post them.

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic