For general talk non car related.
Tasteful jokes.
-
Topic author
Car-Nut
Post
by Car-Nut » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:50 am
What is it?
Fors and against ?
Answer in plain english for a non mechanic

-
Moeregaard
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:23 pm
- Location: Thousand Oaks, California

Post
by Moeregaard » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:46 pm
It's a method of increasing an engine's displacement by lengthening the distance the piston(s) travel inside the cylinder. It's done either by re-grinding the crankpin centers on the crankshaft, or by fitting a completely different crank having a longer stroke. Hot rodders have been doing this for years with American V-8s. Since the Jaguar XK has a 106-mm/4.17" stroke--very long by today's automotive standards-- it's pretty much at its limit for any major gains through stroking.
Mark (Moe) Shipley
Former owner '66FHC, #1E32208
Former owner '65FHC, #1E30036
Planning on getting E-Type No. 3 as soon as possible....
-
Topic author
Car-Nut
Post
by Car-Nut » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:10 pm
Thanks Moe,
Does this therefore weaken the engine

-
Moeregaard
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:23 pm
- Location: Thousand Oaks, California

Post
by Moeregaard » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:48 pm
Longer-stroke engines have a theoretically lower rev limit than engines with shorter strokes. Long stroke engines have more reciprocating mass, longer connecting rods, and higher piston-travel rates (meters/km or feet/mile). The XK's connecting rods are 7.50 inches between centres--very long by today's standard. An advantage to a longer stroke is that torque can be generated at a lower RPM and throughout a wider range than with a shorter stroke. This is one reason a stock E-Type is so docile in traffic.
The main reason I've heard for the Xk's long stroke is that the engine was conceived at a time when horsepower was rated via the RAC, and the equation for determining this (and the subsequent road tax in the UK) was used bore size as a factor when computing output. Smaller bores resulted in lower taxes, so I'm told. Some of you guys in the UK can probably shed more light on this--or debunk this as myth!
Mark (Moe) Shipley
Former owner '66FHC, #1E32208
Former owner '65FHC, #1E30036
Planning on getting E-Type No. 3 as soon as possible....