Hi,
My battery fits onto the tray, the top of it just touches the lower part of the heater motor which I think is wrong.
A SII I had with the same spec lincon battery battery had reasonable clearance.
The battery clamp (which I believe is original) also does not fit the lincon battery.
Do early etypes have a smaller battery? Or incase my car has been altered what should be the approx distance between the battery carrier and the bottom of the heater motor?
Many thanks
Battery Carrier / Battery
#2
on mine its about half an inch and when fitting the battery it only just misses the motor. There is a little more room if I take the battery tray out though which you dont really need.
1964 FHC 4.2
Etype restoration blog http://connor.org.uk
Etype restoration blog http://connor.org.uk
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#3
Thank you for your reply.
Yes on my previous SII must have had over an inch from what I can remember with the same size/spec battery. I am beginning to think either batteries were smaller on the earlier cars or there has been a repair that is not quite right.
Further comments welcomed.
Yes on my previous SII must have had over an inch from what I can remember with the same size/spec battery. I am beginning to think either batteries were smaller on the earlier cars or there has been a repair that is not quite right.
Further comments welcomed.
1961 OTS
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#4
Hi,
Further update.
Haddocks book - Early cars fitted with Lucas Pacemaker P/N CP 13/11-8, later cars had P/N XC55/8 battery.
Does anyone have the dimensions of these original Lucas batteries.
Further update.
Haddocks book - Early cars fitted with Lucas Pacemaker P/N CP 13/11-8, later cars had P/N XC55/8 battery.
Does anyone have the dimensions of these original Lucas batteries.
1961 OTS
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
-
PeterCrespin
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
- Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
- Contact:

#5
Hmmm, define 'need'?ChrisC wrote: There is a little more room if I take the battery tray out though which you dont really need.
If you don't mind the battery chaffing the mild steel and starting rust of bare metal, you don't need a tray.
If you don't mind not having a tray to collect acid-tainted water and condensation, taking it away to vent below sill level via the attached tubing, you don't need a tray.
If you don't mind the lower left bulkhead being exposed to corrosive influences normally controlled using the above parts, you don't need a tray.
If you don't mind having a too-tall battery that will only fit if you leave the tray out, you don't need a tray.
If your answer to any of the above is 'No' then you need a tray.
Pete
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#6
or you could fit a sealed for life battery so none of the above is relevant....
1964 FHC 4.2
Etype restoration blog http://connor.org.uk
Etype restoration blog http://connor.org.uk
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |
#7
Better still go for an SBS battery - half the weight twice the cranking power and mine has lasted 12 years and still going strong.
David Jones
S1 OTS OSB
1997 Porsche 911 Guards Red
2024 Lexus LBX
Add your E-Type to our World Map: http://forum.etypeuk.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1810
S1 OTS OSB
1997 Porsche 911 Guards Red
2024 Lexus LBX
Add your E-Type to our World Map: http://forum.etypeuk.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1810
| Link: | |
| BBcode: | |
| HTML: | |
| Hide post links |



