Rear spring rates

Technical advice Q&A

Gfhug
Posts: 3751
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:08 pm
Location: Near Andover, Hampshire,in D.O. Blighty
Great Britain

#41

Post by Gfhug » Fri Feb 27, 2015 4:06 pm

Do we have a final solution for the rear springs as I hope to order complete shock/spring sets in two or three weeks time and it would be nice to be certain about whether it's safe to order them?

Seeing comments on another thread about badly made shocks are any supplied in reliable quality?

Thanks
Geoff
S2 FHC Light Blue
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Simonpfhc
Posts: 766
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#42

Post by Simonpfhc » Fri Feb 27, 2015 4:43 pm

Hi Geoff,

Not really got any closure on this. There are a handful of people (on this thread) who definitely have these slightly stiffer springs. We really need someone to fit these springs and check the ride height.

Having said that, SNG have confirmed that they have not changed supplier and have sold "hundreds" of these, so if the ride height is higher, it may only be by a tiny amount??

Of course I now need to go and check my recently purchased Boge shocks too to check of they are made straight!

Cheers.
Simon
62 3.8 FHC
91 Porsche 928GT
Find me on Instagram and Facebook @oldcarfixer

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Gfhug
Posts: 3751
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:08 pm
Location: Near Andover, Hampshire,in D.O. Blighty
Great Britain

#43

Post by Gfhug » Fri Feb 27, 2015 5:24 pm

Thanks Simon. Looks necessary to ask the suppliers to check the boge shocks including the combined shocks/springs before they ship them
S2 FHC Light Blue
S2 OTS LHD - RHD full restoration

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


adam
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:11 pm
Great Britain

#44

Post by adam » Fri Feb 27, 2015 6:18 pm

Hi it would be kind if you called the paint on the dust shrouds and shocks a transit primer. better to buy them, paint yourself and put them together. I will post pics soon and give ride height comparison between old and new.

Adam

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

abowie
Posts: 4108
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:15 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:
Australia

#45

Post by abowie » Fri Feb 27, 2015 10:14 pm

Simonpfhc wrote: We really need someone to fit these springs and check the ride height.
The difference on my 3.8 OTS was about 4cm. I have refitted the original rear shocks.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 8983
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#46

Post by mgcjag » Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:43 am

Andrew.....when u first said not to buy SNG springs u said that your car sat 3in too high?...

.I think that for anyone now looking at rear ride hight they must give a measurement and quote there tyre size and model.....its no good measuring from the wheel arches as these could have been re made......so ideally fron tha IRS bottom plate lowest point of curved lip to the ground Steve

S2 2+2......Vrederstien sprint classice 185HR15(32psi)....7.25in
SNG springs/boge unit fitted 3years ago
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

abowie
Posts: 4108
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:15 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:
Australia

#47

Post by abowie » Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:54 am

The initial 3" estimate was made from a picture of my car that I took after installing the IRS. It had no fuel spare wheel or interior in the car although I have a lot of pictures of the car as I've rebuilt it and I got confused at what state the car was. At the time of the post I didn't have the car as it was at the trimmers.

4cm though is the measured difference between the SNG springs and the old springs after the car was fully assembled and had been driven. So 3" is wrong; 4cm is what I actually ended up measuring though.

Sorry for the confusion. I stick to my guns though; the springs marked with yellow/blue paint from SNG are not right for my 3.8 OTS.
Andrew.
881824, 1E21538. 889457. 1961 4.3l Mk2. 1975 XJS. 1962 MGB. 1979 MGB.
http://www.projectetype.com/index.php/the-blog.html
Adelaide, Australia

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 8983
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#48

Post by mgcjag » Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:07 pm

Hi All........A friends S2 ots.....believed original shocks/springs...Dunlop SP 32psi....7.5in rear ride height....bottom of IRS lip...to floor
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


iani
Posts: 520
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Northamptonshire
Great Britain

#49

Post by iani » Sat Apr 04, 2015 5:18 pm

S2 2+2 Pirelli Cinturato 185VR15 32 psi, Boge shocks & SNGB Springs give 7.5" from IRS lip to floor. The ride height looks even front to rear.

Ian
E-type - TBC
1968 Triumph GT6 Mk1

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

Topic author
Simonpfhc
Posts: 766
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#50

Post by Simonpfhc » Sat Apr 04, 2015 6:13 pm

Thanks for your feedback Ian. It's good to hear that someone has had good results with the SNGB springs ;-)

I wonder if the springs suit the 2+2 better due to the heavier tub? I'm just about to check weights........

Cheers.
Simon
62 3.8 FHC
91 Porsche 928GT
Find me on Instagram and Facebook @oldcarfixer

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


and.nox
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:17 am
Location: Sydney - Australia

#51

Post by and.nox » Mon May 04, 2015 2:00 am

I've read with interest this thread and noted there's no discussion regarding S3's. I've got a coupe that was sagging in the rear, measuring 175 mm clearance as opposed to the 200mm required. I just received 4 new springs (part no. C32062) from Barratts and have fitted them. Ride height hasn't changed - still about 25mm too low. Shocks are new Boges from Barratts and all bushes on wishbones appear good. the new springs had a free length of about 250mm, as opposed to the old ones which were 258mm. The new ones where a heavier wire and had less coils so I figured that, despite the new ones being slightly shorter, they may still result in a higher ride height. No such luck!!

My question is, are these new springs made in different lengths or with different ratings. My new ones have yellow and green paint marks on them.
Andrew S
'73 S3 COUPE, '15 Ford XR6

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1746
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#52

Post by MarekH » Mon May 04, 2015 6:40 am

Dear Andrew,

You'll also need to check and adjust the front ride height.
I doubt that the suppliers have any idea "what the numbers are".

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


and.nox
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:17 am
Location: Sydney - Australia

#53

Post by and.nox » Mon May 04, 2015 7:07 am

Marek,

Front ride height is per spec. Rear ride height measurements taken with full tank of fuel, correct tyre pressures and 70 profile tyres.

I s'pose the other option is to try and get some coil spring spacers in polyurethane to lift it the required amount. Gaz adjustable shocks seem ridiculously expensive
Andrew S
'73 S3 COUPE, '15 Ford XR6

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1746
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#54

Post by MarekH » Mon May 04, 2015 7:22 am

Any spacers you put in will have to be machined from something rigid like steel. Polyurethane is a completely unsuitable material to support that sort of pressure.

PM me your email address and I'll send you a sample picture of some that I have in the garage.

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 8983
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#55

Post by mgcjag » Mon May 04, 2015 8:06 am

Hi Andrew....SNG Battatts have a metal spacer to fit on top of there springs, I know becaus a friends S3 was a bit low and we fitted them.....as far as i am aware there is no set height for the rear suspension, but most cars i have measured come inbetween 180 and 200....Steve
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


MarekH
Posts: 1746
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm
Location: Surrey
Great Britain

#56

Post by MarekH » Mon May 04, 2015 9:03 am

Dear Steve,

The correct ride height is in the s3 manual.

The s3 is a slightly heavier car and so the same ride height as a s1 would be achieved with slightly stronger springs. Using the wrong springs or old springs is why you'd need a spacer.

kind regards
Marek

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

paydase
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:11 am
Location: Belgium
Belgium

#57

Post by paydase » Mon May 04, 2015 11:45 am

Yes but...

Putting a spacer may allow recovering the correct car's height but not provide the suitable resistance if the car is heavier.

The right approach would be indeed to look for stronger springs.
Serge
1964 (3.8) FHC
1961 OTS

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

mgcjag
Moderator
Posts: 8983
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: Ludlow Shropshire
Great Britain

#58

Post by mgcjag » Mon May 04, 2015 12:11 pm

Hi Marek......yes u are correct the ride height for the S3 is in the manual section 64.25.12 should be 20.08+- .64cm (7.90in +- .25in)....cannot find a reference for S1 or S2 rear ride height......Not sure what profile of tyre was used on S3 for these measurements. But it does state a full tank of fuel On my friends S3 we fitted new springs and boge shocks from Barratts....we did not measure the ride height but my friend wanted a bit more as he used the car in London with all the speed bumps so we fitted the spacer to increase it..Steve
Steve
69 S2 2+2 (sold) ..Realm C type replica, 1960 xk150fhc

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

User avatar

PeterCrespin
Posts: 4561
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:22 pm
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Contact:
United States of America

#59

Post by PeterCrespin » Mon May 04, 2015 1:05 pm

MarekH wrote:Polyurethane is a completely unsuitable material to support that sort of pressure.
Depends. Jaguar used something like polyurethane for the bottom spring pan spacers on the Series XJ models at the front. Having one huge spring per side and at the heavy end, these spacers are stacked to adjust ride height and take more load than the little ones on the IRS. They could be nylon as the bunch I have are that colour, but they are definitely softer than Delrin I've machined on a lathe.

But yes, alloy makes most sense on coil-overs.
1E75339 UberLynx D-Type; 1R27190 70 FHC; 1E78478; 2001 Vanden Plas

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links


Alty Ian
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:24 am
Location: Cheshire
Great Britain

#60

Post by Alty Ian » Mon May 04, 2015 8:44 pm

Andy

I fitted new springs and steel spacers to my S3 2+2 last year as its ride height was 170mm and the exhaust constantly grounded on speed bumps, when I took them off the springs were exactly the same spec and length as the old ones, so fitted the spacers and the ride height was then 225mm, actually too high but it has settled down over the last year a bit, it never hits speed bumps anymore :D See the thread below page 3 for more details.

viewtopic.php?t=5055
64 S1 4.2 OTS 1E10012 73 S3 2+2 manual 2013 V6 F type OTS

Link:
BBcode:
HTML:
Hide post links
Show post links

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic